Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:40:38.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MAYFLIES (EPHEMEROPTERA) OF MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA: NEW SPECIES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND RECORDS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Richard K. Allen  and
Sandra D. Cohen
Richard K. Allen
Affiliation:
California State University, Los Angeles
Sandra D. Cohen
Affiliation:
California State University, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Descriptions and figures of five undescribed species are presented: Lachlania talea, L. iops, Epeorus (Iron) packeri, Rhithrogena notialis, and Heptagenia bella. Heptagenia mexicana Ulmer is tentatively transferred to the genus Stenonema, the nymphal stage is described for Isonychia sicca manca Eaton and Homoeoneuria salviniae Eaton, and new collection records extend the known distributional range of Dactylobaetis mexicanus Traver & Edmunds, D. musseri Traver & Edmunds, D. zenobia Traver & Edmunds, Isonychia sicca manca, Homoeoneuria salviniae, Epeorus (Iron) metlacensis Traver, and Stenonema mexicana.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , March 1977 , pp. 399 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, N. 1910. Notes on our eastern species of the mayfly genus Heptagenia. Can. Ent. 42: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1953. The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv. 26 (Art. 1). 216 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1834. Descriptions of some nondescript British species of mayflies of anglers. Philos. Mag. Ser. 3, No. 20: 120–125; No. 21: 212–218.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1871. A monograph on the Ephemeridae. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1871. 164 pp.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1881. An announcement of new genera of the Ephemeridae. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 17: 191–197.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1883–1888. A revisional monograph of recent Ephemeridae or mayflies. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Ser. Zool.) 3: 1–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, A. E. 1892. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insects, Neuroptera, Ephemeridae, 1–18.Google Scholar
Edmunds, G. F., Berner, L., and Traver, J. R.. 1958. North American mayflies of the family Oligoneuriidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 51: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmins, D. E. 1934. Notes on the Ephemeroptera of the Godman and Salvin collection, with descriptions of two new species. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 14: 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1923. New Canadian Ephemeridae with notes. Can. Ent. 55: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDunnough, J. 1931. The genus Isonychia (Ephemeroptera). Can. Ent. 63: 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navas, L. 1924. Insectos de la America Central. Broteria 21: 55–86.Google Scholar
Needham, J. G. and Murphy, H. E.. 1924. Neotropical mayflies. Bull. Lloyd Lib. (Ent. Ser. 4). 79 pp.Google Scholar
Spieth, H. T. 1938. Two interesting mayfly nymphs with a description of a new species. Am. Mus. Novit. 970. 7 pp.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1933. Mayflies of North Carolina, Pt. III. J. Elisha Mitchell Soc. 48: 141–206.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1935. Systematic, Part II, pp. 267–739. In Needham, J. G., Traver, J. R., and Hsu, Yin-Chi, The biology of mayflies. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.759 pp.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. 1964–1965. A new species of the subgenus Iron from Mexico (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 59–60: 23–29.Google Scholar
Traver, J. R. and Edmunds, G. F. Jr., 1968. A revision of the Baetidae with spatulate-clawed nymphs (Ephemeroptera). Pacif. Insects 10: 629–677.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1919. Neue Ephemeroptera. Arch. Naturgesch. 19: 1–80.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1853. List of neuropterous insects in the British Museum. Pt. III. Termites and Ephemeridae. pp. 533–585.Google Scholar