Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:23:16.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NATURAL ENEMIES AND INSECT ASSOCIATES OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), IN SUGAR PINE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. L. Dahlsten
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, Department of Entomological SciencesUniversity of California, Berkeley
F. M. Stephen
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, Department of Entomological SciencesUniversity of California, Berkeley

Abstract

The mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, and 68 associated insect species were reared from infested sugar pine, Pinus lambertiana. Portions of three infested trees were sectioned by height and the insects emerging from each were identified and recorded. In one tree the number of woodpecker strikes also was noted. The tops of two of the three trees were infested by another bark beetle, Pityophthorus confertus, and from these same two trees the most common parasite obtained was Macromesus americanus.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amman, G. D. 1972. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. J. econ. Ent. 65: 138140.Google Scholar
Ball, J. C. and Dahlsten, D. L.. 1973. Hymenopterous parasites of Ips paraconfusus Lanier and their contribution to mortality. I. Influence of host tree and tree diameter on parasitization. Can. Ent. 105: 14531464.Google Scholar
Bushing, R. W. 1965. A synoptic list of the parasites of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) in North America north of Mexico. Can. Ent. 97: 449492.Google Scholar
Chansler, J. F. 1967. Biology and life history of Dendroctonus adjunctus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 760767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlsten, D. L. and Bushing, R. W.. 1970. Insect parasites of the western pine beetle, pp. 113–118. In Stark, R. W. and Dahlsten, D. L. (Eds.), Studies on the population dynamics of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Univ. Calif. Div. Agric. Sci. 174 pp.Google Scholar
DeLeon, D. 1934. An annotated list of the parasites, predators, and other associated fauna of the mountain pine beetle in western white pine and lodgepole pine. Can. Ent. 66: 5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMars, C. J., Berryman, A. A., Dahlsten, D. L., Otvos, I. S., and Stark, R. W.. 1970. Spatial and temporal variations in the distribution of the western pine beetle, its predators and parasites, and woodpecker activity in infested trees, pp. 80–101. In Stark, R. W. and Dahlsten, D. L. (Eds.), Studies on the population dynamics of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Univ. Calif. Div. Agric. Sci. 174 pp.Google Scholar
McCambridge, W. F. and Trostle, G. C.. 1972. The mountain pine beetle. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Pest Leafl. 2. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1972. Southern pine beetle mortality in North Carolina caused by parasites and predators. Environ. Ent. 1: 5865.Google Scholar
Moser, J. C., Thatcher, R. C., and Pickard, L. S.. 1971. Relative abundance of southern pine beetle associates in east Texas. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 7277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaard, N. A. 1968. Insects associated with the southern pine beetle in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. J. econ. Ent. 61: 11971201.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. B. and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1962. Biology and habits of the Douglas-fir beetle parasite, Coeloides brunneri Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in western Oregon. Can. Ent. 94: 748763.Google Scholar
Schmid, J. M. 1972. Emergence, attack densities, and seasonal trends of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) in the Black Hills. U.S. Dep. Agric. Serv. Res. Note RM-211. 7 pp.Google Scholar