Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:49:04.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PINE OIL AND OLEIC ACID DELAY AND REDUCE ATTACKS ON LOGS BY AMBROSIA BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. W. Nijholt
W. W. Nijholt
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia V8Z 1M5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pine oil, derived from pulp mill by-products, and oleic acid significantly delayed and reduced the attack by ambrosia beetles Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) and Gnathotrichus spp. on Douglas-fir logs. Pine oil also appeared to interfere with the attack by bark beetles. The possibility of combining the use of repellents with a pheromone-based diversion scheme is suggested as an effective protection strategy.

Résumé

L’huile de Pin, dérivée de sous-produits d’usines de pâtes et papiers et l’acide oléique ont significativement retardé et réduit l’attaque des scolytes du bois Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) et Gnathotrichus spp. sur des grumes de Douglas taxifolié. L’huile de Pin a de plus semblé efficace contre les scolytes de l’écorce. L’auteur suggère la possibilité de combiner l’utilisation de répulsifs avec une solution de diversion à base de phéromones comme stratégie de protection efficace.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , 01 February 1980 , pp. 199 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borden, J. H., Handley, J. R., Johnston, B. D., MacConnell, J. G., Silverstein, R. M., Slessor, K. N., Swigar, A. A., and Wong, D. T. W.. 1979. Synthesis and field testing of 4,6,6-lineatin, the aggregation pheromone of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 5: 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., Handley, J. R., McLean, J. A., Silverstein, R. M., Chong, L., Slessor, K. N., Johnston, E., and Schuler, H. R.. Enantiomer-based specificity in pheromone communication by two sympatric Gnathotrichus spp. (Coleoptera:Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
Bryne, K. F., Swigar, A. A., Silverstein, R. M., Borden, H. H., and Stokkink, E.. 1974. Sulcatol: population aggregation pheromone in the scolytid beetle, Gnathotrichus sulcatus. J. Insect Physiol. 20: 1895–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cade, S. C., Hrutfiord, B. F., and Gara, R. I.. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant for Gnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1014–1015.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1955. Window flight traps for insects. Can. Ent. 87: 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobie, J. 1978. Ambrosia beetles have expensive tastes. Can. For. Serv., Pacif. For. Res. Centre Inf. Rep. BC-P-24-78.Google Scholar
Graham, K. and Boyes, E. C.. 1950. Pinworms in lumber (historical and economic aspects). Br. Columbia Lumberm. 34: 42, 106.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, J. M. 1957. Two practical methods of identifying type of ambrosia beetle damage. J. econ. Ent. 50: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConnell, J. G., Borden, J. H., Silverstein, R. M., and Stokkink, E.. 1977. Isolation and tentative identification of lineatin, a pheromone from the frass of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 3: 549–561.Google Scholar
McBride, C. F. and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1960. Lumber degrade caused by ambrosia beetles. Br. Columbia Lumberm. 44(7): 40–52.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1975. Survey for Gnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a commercial sawmill with the pheromone, sulcatol. Can. J. For. Res. 5: 586–591.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1977. Suppression of Gnathotrichus sulcatus with sulcatol-baited traps in a commercial sawmill and notes on the occurrence of G. retusus and Trypodendron lineatum. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 348–356.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1979. An operational pheromone-based suppression program for an ambrosia beetle, Gnathotrichus sulcatus, in a commercial sawmill. J. econ. Ent. 72: 165–172.Google Scholar
Moeck, H. A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 985–995.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1970. The effect of mating and the presence of the male ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum, on “secondary” attraction. Can. Ent. 102: 894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1973 a. The effect of male Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on the response of field populations to secondary attraction. Can. Ent. 105: 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1973 b. Ambrosia beetle attacks delayed by turpentine oil. Can. Dept. Fish. and For. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 29(6): 36.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1978 a. Ambrosia beetle: A menace to the forest industry. Can. For. Serv., Pacif. For. Res. Centre Inf. Rep. BC-P-25-78.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1978 b. Evaluation of operational watermisting for log protection from abrosia beetle damage. Can. For. Serv., Pacif. For. Res. Centre Inf. Rep. BC-P-22-78.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. M. 1935. The role of pine oil in cattle fly sprays. Bull. Univ. Delaware agric. Exp. Stn. 196.Google Scholar
Puritch, G. S. 1975. The toxic effects of fatty acids and their salts on the balsam woolly aphid, Adelges piceae (Ratz.). Can. J. For. Res. 5: 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, H. A. and Nijholt, W. W.. 1972. Watermisting for log protection from abrosia beetles in B.C. Can. For. Serv., Pacif. For. Res. Centre Inf. Rep. BC-P-4-72.Google Scholar
Richmond, H. A. and Radcliffe, D. N.. 1961. Ambrosia beetle attack on sawlogs in water storage. Br. Columbia Lumberm. 45(10), October 1961.Google Scholar