Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:46:17.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PREBLOOM PETROLEUM OIL APPLICATIONS FOR DELAYING PEAR PSYLLA (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLIDAE) OVIPOSITION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. W. Zwick
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Mid-Columbia Experiment Station, Hood River 97031
P. H. Westigard
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Southern Oregon Experiment Station, Medford 97501

Abstract

Application of petroleum oils prior to oviposition by overwintering pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster, reduced oviposition by 98% for up to 5 weeks. The delay of oviposition and reduction in subsequent egg and nymph densities were inversely proportional to the rate of oil used. The reduced oviposition rate was due primarily to inhibition of oviposition by oil deposits on the host, not adult mortality. No commercially important deleterious effects of oil treatments were detected on several pear varieties.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burts, E. C. 1968. An area control program for the pear psylla. J. econ. Ent. 61: 261263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, P. J. and Catlin, Gertrude A.. 1976. Growth stages in fruit trees — from dormant to fruit set. Food and Life Sci. Bull. N.Y. agric. Exp. Stn 58. Plant Sciences 11. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. W. 1948. Pear psylla control with dormant sprays. J. econ. Ent. 41: 443445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkiss, H. E. 1914. Susceptibility to spraying mixtures of hibernating pear psylla adults and their eggs. Bull. N.Y. agric. Exp. Stn 387. pp. 389418.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. F. and Marshall, J.. 1961. Dormant sprays for the control of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola, in British Columbia. J. econ. Ent. 54: 10001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. A. 1932. The status of lubricating oil sprays in Ontario. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 62: 4957.Google Scholar
Smith, E. H. 1965. The susceptibility of life history stages of pear psylla to oil treatment. J. econ. Ent. 58: 456464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westigard, P. H. and Zwick, R. W.. 1972. The pear psylla in Oregon. Tech. Bull. Ore. agric. Exp. Stn 122. 22 pp.Google Scholar