Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:51:03.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESPONSE OF CONE AND TWIG BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) AND A PREDATOR (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) TO PITYOL, CONOPHTHORIN, AND VERBENONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Peter de Groot  and
Gary L. DeBarr
Peter de Groot*
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Gary L. DeBarr
Affiliation:
Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Athens, Georgia, United States 30602
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: pdegroot@nrcan.gc.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in the United States and Canada to determine the response of the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz), and the red pine cone beetle, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, to two potential inhibitors, conophthorin and verbenone, of pheromone communication. Trap catches of male C. coniperda and C. resinosae were significantly reduced and generally declined with increasing concentrations of conophthorin in traps baited with the pityol, a female-produced pheromone. Verbenone did not significantly reduce trap catches of C. coniperda. Conophthorin, but not verbenone, significantly reduced cone attacks by C. coniperda when placed near cone clusters. The twig beetles, Pityophthorus cariniceps LeConte and Pityophthorus puberulus (LeConte), responded to traps with pityol and α-pinene baits alone or with conophthorin. Thanasimus dubius (F) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) was attracted to the pityol and α-pinene, but conophthorin had no effect on attraction of this generalist bark beetle predator. Verbenone significantly reduced trap catches of T. dubius in pityol-baited traps.

Résumé

Des études sur le terrain ont été entreprises aux États-unis et au Canada pour déterminer la réaction du Scolyte des cônes du pin blanc, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) et du Scolyte des cônes du pin rouge, C. resinosae Hopkins, à deux inhibiteurs potentiels de la communication par les phéromones, la conophthorine et la verbénone. Le nombre de captures de mâles de C. coniperda et de C. resinosae a diminué significativement et de façon générale lorsqu’augmentait la concentration de conophthorine dans des pièges garnis de pityol, une phéromone femelle. La verbénone n’a pas réduit significativement le nombre de captures de C. coniperda. La conophthorine, mais pas la verbénone, a réduit significativement le nombre d’infestations de cônes par des C. coniperda placés au voisinage de groupes de cônes. Les scolytes des rameaux Pityophthorus cariniceps LeConte et Pityophthorus puberulus (LeConte) ont eu des réactions positives aux pièges garnis de pityol ou d’α-pinène, seuls ou en combinaison avec de la conophtorine. Thanasimus dubius (F.) (Coleoptera : Cleridae) était attiré par les pièges garnis de pityol ou d’α-pinène, mais la conophthorine n’avait pas de pouvoir d’attraction pour ce prédateur de scolytes. La verbénone a eu pour effet de diminuer le nombre de T. dubius capturés dans les pièges garnis de pityol.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 6 , December 2000 , pp. 843 - 851
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billings, R.F. 1988. Forecasting southern pine beetle infestation trends with pheromone traps. pp. 295–306in Payne, T.L., Saarenmaa, H. (Eds), Integrated control of scolytid bark beetles. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University PressGoogle Scholar
Billings, R.F., Cameron, R.S. 1984. Kairomonal responses of Coleoptera, Monochamus titillator (Cerambycidae), Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae), and Temnochila virescens (Trogosotidae), to behavioral chemicals of southern pine beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology 13: 1542–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgersson, G., DeBarr, G.L., de Groot, P., Dalusky, M.J., Pierce, H.D. Jr, Borden, J.H., Meyer, H., Francke, W., Espelie, K., Berisford, C.W. 1995. Pheromones in white pine cone beetle Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 143–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borden, J.H. 1993. Strategies and tactics for the use of semiochemicals against forest insects pests in North America. pp. 265–79 in Leonhardt, B.A., Vaughn, J.L. (Eds), Pest management: biologically-based technologies. Washington: American Chemical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H. 1996. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. pp. 421–38 in Cardé, R.T., Minks, A.K. (Eds), Pheromone research: new directions. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
Bright, D.E. Jr. 1981. Taxonomic monograph of the genus Pityophthorus Eichhoff in North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 118Google Scholar
Dallara, P.L. 1997. Studies on the distribution, interspecific relationships, host range, and chemical ecology of Pityophthorus spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and selected insectan associates, and their associations with Fusarium subglutinans f.sp. pini in central coastal California. PhD dissertation, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Dallara, P.L., Seybold, S.J., Meyer, H., Tolasch, T., Francke, W., Wood, D.L. 2000. Semiochemicals from three species of Pityophthorus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): identification and field response. The Canadian Entomologist 132: 899–906Google Scholar
de Groot, P. 1992. Biosystematics of Conophthorus Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in eastern North America. PhD dissertation, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., Debarr, G.L. 1998. Factors affecting capture of the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Col., Scolytidae) in pheromone traps. Journal of Applied Entomology 122: 281–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., MacDonald, L.M. 1999. Green leaf volatiles inhibit response of red pine cone beetle Conophthorus resinosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to a sex pheromone. Naturwissenschaften 86: 81–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., Zylstra, B.F. 1995. Factors affecting capture of male red pine cone beetles, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in pheromone traps. The Canadian Entomologist 127: 851–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., DeBarr, G.L., Birgersson, G.O., Pierce, H.D. Jr, Borden, J.H., Berisford, Y.C., Berisford, C.W. 1991. Evidence for a female-produced pheromone in white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz), and in the red pine cone beetle, C. resinosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist 123: 1057–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, P., DeBarr, G.L., Birgersson, G. 1998. Field bioassays of synthetic pheromones and host monoterpenes for Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 382–7Google Scholar
Francke, W. 1981. Spiroacetale als pheromone bei insecten. Mitteilungen der Deutsche Gesellschaft der Allgemeine Angwandte Entomologie 2: 248–51Google Scholar
Francke, W., Hindorf, G., Reith, W. 1978. Methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decanes as odors of Paravespula vulgaris (L.). Angewandte Chemie 90: 915Google Scholar
Francke, W., Hindorf, G., Reith, W. 1979. Alkyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]-decanes—a new class of pheromones. Naturwissenschaften 66: 618–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francke, W., Pan, M.L., Köning, W.A. 1987. Identification of ‘pityol’ and ‘grandisol’ as pheromone components of the bark beetle Pityophthorus pityographus. Naturwissenschaften 74: 343–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, P.A., Odell, T.M. 1965. The life history of the white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 58: 213–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlin, A.F., Yates, H.O. III, Tovar, D.C., Ebel, B.H., Koeber, T.W., Merkel, E.P. 1980. Cone and seed insects on North American conifers. Canadian Forestry Service, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
Herdy, H. 1959. A method of determining the sex of adult bark beetles of the genus Conophthorus. Canadian Department of Agriculture, Forest Biology Division, Bi-Monthly Progress Report 15: 1–2Google Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. 1899. Report on investigations to determine the cause of unhealthy conditions of the spruce and pine from 1880–1893. West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 56Google Scholar
Kohnle, U., Densborn, S., Kölsch, P., Meyer, H., Francke, W. 1992. E-7-Methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decane in the chemical communication of European Scolytidae and Nitidulidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Applied Entomology 114: 187–92Google Scholar
Lindgren, B.S., Borden, J.H. 1993. Displacement and aggregation of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in response to their antiaggregation and aggregation pheromones. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 286–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, H.D. Jr., de Groot, P., Borden, J.H., Ramaswamy, S., Oehlschager, A.C. 1995. Pheromones in the red pine cone beetle, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, and its synonym, C. banksianae McPherson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 169–85Google Scholar
Richerson, J.V., Payne, T.L. 1979. Effects of bark beetle inhibitors on landing and attack behavior of the southern pine beetle and its associates. Environmental Entomology 8: 360–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J.P., Williams, D.L. 1970. Thanasimus dubius: prey perception. Journal of Insect Physiology 16: 233–9Google Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles in North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). A taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 6Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar