Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:13:38.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESPONSE OF THE APPLE MAGGOT, RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA, AND THE CHERRY FRUIT FLY, R. FAUSTA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE), TO PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE BAIT SPRAYS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. H. Reissig
W. H. Reissig
Affiliation:
Entomology Department, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

None of five mixtures of protein hydrolysate and azinphosmethyl which were applied as foliar sprays (1.0, 2.0, 5.0% yeast hydrolysate, 2.0% corn hydrolysate, and 2.0% soy hydrolysate) killed significantly more apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella, or black cherry fruit flies, R. fausta, than a spray of azinphosmethyl alone which was used as a control. This suggests that hydrolysate bait sprays would be no more effective than a toxicant alone in controlling these flies.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , February 1977 , pp. 161 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, M. M. and Ortega, J. C.. 1959. Experiments with protein hydrolysate bait sprays for control of the walnut husk fly. J. econ. Ent. 52: 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buriff, C. R. and Still, G. W.. 1973. Black cherry fruit fly: Bait spray for control. J. econ. Ent. 66: 1350–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D. L. 1974. Pest control by attractants: a case study demonstrating economy, specificity, and environmental acceptability. Bioscience 24: 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolphin, R. E., Cleveland, M. L., Still, G. W., and Mouzin, T. E.. 1970. Reduction of populations of apple maggots with bait sprays. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1878–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, A. J. and Connor, L. J.. 1965. The response of Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) adults and other insects to trap boards baited with protein hydrolysate baits. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 95: 134–136.Google Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. 1960. Field tests of some hydrolyzed proteins as lures for the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Can. Ent. 92: 464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. and Sanford, K. H.. 1974. Apple maggot control with baited and unbaited sprays of azinphos-methyl. J. econ. Ent. 67: 556–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. 1975. Selective new trap for Rhagoletis cingulata and R. pomonella flies. Environ. Ent. 4: 420–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reissig, W. H. 1974. Field tests of traps and lures of the apple maggot. J. econ. Ent. 67: 484–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F. 1952. Fruit fly control in Hawaii with poison bait sprays containing protein hydrolysates. J. econ. Ent. 45: 838–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F. 1969. Control and eradication of fruit flies on citrus. Proc. 1st int. Citrus Symp. 2: 381–387.Google Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Mitchell, W. C., and Ohinata, K.. 1958. Fruit fly control with poisoned bait sprays in Hawaii. USDA, ARS (ser.) 33–3.Google Scholar