Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:43:53.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEMI-STERILE MUTANTS IN THE ONION MAGGOT, HYLEMYA ANTIQUA (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE), POPULATION EFFECTS IN FIELD CAGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. A. Keith Reid  and
F. L. McEwen
J. A. Keith Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
F. L. McEwen
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A sterile insect release may reduce the rate of reproduction in the pest population exposed but has no carry-over potential to succeeding generations. Serebrovskii (1940) suggested the use, in release programs, of semi-sterile insects of such genetic make-up that their reproductive potential is low. The advantage claimed is that this trait would be inherited and would lower the reproductive rate in succeeding generations (Curtis 1968; Rai et al. 1973; Knipling and Klassen 1976). The genetic factor most widely suggested for producing this type of continuing semisterility is the chromosomal rearrangement called a translocation (Fitz-Earle 1976; Robinson 1976). In laboratory and field cage tests, it has been demonstrated that chromosomal translocations reduced the reproductive rate in several insect species in the generation in which the translocation is introduced (Robinson 1976). However, in such experiments, the effect of a single release of individuals on population levels in subsequent generations has not, to date, been demonstrated.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 6 , June 1979 , pp. 749 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curtis, C.F. 1968. Possible use of translocations to fix desirable genes in insect pest populations. Nature, Lond. 218: 368–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitz-Earle, M. 1976. Insect population control using genetic engineering. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 22: 11–14.Google Scholar
Knipling, E.F. and Klassen, W.. 1976. Relative efficiency of various genetic mechanisms for suppression of insect populations. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1533.Google Scholar
Rai, K.S., Grover, K.K., and Suguna, S.G.. 1973. Genetic manipulation of Aedes aegypti: incorporation and maintenance of a genetic marker and a chromosomal translocation in natural populations. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 48: 49–56.Google Scholar
Reid, J.A.K. and McEwen, F.L.. 1977. Genetic insect control: Chromosome rearrangements isolated using a simple system in the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Can. Ent. 109: 1287–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J.A.K. and Wehrhahn, C.F.. 1976. Genetic control of insect populations: isolation and fitness determination of autosomal translocations. Can. Ent. 108: 1409–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A.S. 1976. Progress in the use of chromosomal translocations for the control of insect pests. Biol. Rev. 51: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serebrovskii, A.S. 1940. On the possibility of a new method for the control of insect pests. Zool. Zh. Ukr. 19: 618–630. (In Russian.)Google Scholar