Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:37:26.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TECHNIQUES FOR STUDYING THE BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE EUROPEAN EARWIG, FORFICULA AURICULARIA (DERMAPTERA: FORFICULIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert J. Lamb  and
W. G. Wellington
Robert J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
W. G. Wellington
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science and Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European earwig is an excellent experimental animal for many laboratory and field studies of insect ecology and behavior, but special rearing, marking, and trapping techniques are required to exploit the insects’ potential fully. This paper describes an artificial nest and associated techniques which reduce rearing mortality below 10%. Methods of studying events in natural nests, and of capturing and marking individuals for population studies, also are described.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 8 , August 1974 , pp. 881 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beall, G. 1932. The life history and behaviour of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L., in British Columbia. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 61: 28–43.Google Scholar
Behura, B. K. 1956. The biology of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia Linn. Ann. Zool., Agra 61: 117–142.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. and McLeod, J. H.. 1952. Effects of certain climatic factors on the daily abundance of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), in Vancouver, British Columbia. Can. Ent. 61: 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumb, S. E., Eide, P. M., and Bonn, A. E.. 1941. The European earwig. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., No. 766. 76 pp.Google Scholar
Kapoor, V. C. and Baijal, H. N.. 1967. A simple laboratory method for rearing earwigs. Agra Univ. J. Res. 61: 15–16.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. A. and Wiltshire, C. W.. 1972. A method for anaesthetizing or killing insects in the field. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 61: 129.Google Scholar
Knabke, J. J. and Grigarick, A. A.. 1971. Biology of the African earwig, Euborellia cincticollis (Gerstaecker), in California and comparative notes on Euborellia annulipes (Lucas). Hilgardia 61: 157–194.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. J. 1974 (unpub.). Earwig travel in relation to habitat. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Legner, E. F. and Davis, D. W.. 1962. Tests with attractants and a simple trap for the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1006–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1965. Note on control of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L., in Newfoundland with traps and attractants. Can. Ent. 61: 1075–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. A. and Wilde, W. H. A.. 1971. Some effects of gamma radiation on earwigs in Ontario, Canada (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). Can. Ent. 61: 1201–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar