Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:49:37.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fifty British By-Elections*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Lionel H. Laing
Lionel H. Laing*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 1950 , pp. 222 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The writer is indebted to the following members of his seminar: Mrs. Edith Brashares, Vernon Beal, Reo Christenson, William Ellet, and Robert Warrick.

References

1 Pollock, James K., “British By-elections between the Wars” (American Political Science Review, vol. XXXV, 06, 1941, p. 527).Google Scholar

2 United Kingdom, House of Commons, Parliamentary Debate, 4th series, vol. 132, col. 1016.Google Scholar

3 Butler, David, “Trends in British By-elections” (Journal of Politics, vol. XI, 05, 1949, p. 396).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Pollock, , “British By-elections between the Wars,” p. 527.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 521.

6 “Left or Right” (The Economist, 11 27, 1948, p. 867).Google Scholar

7 Ibid., Oct. 16, 1948.

8 The writer was present in Great Britain during ten days of the closing period of the campaign and immediately afterwards during which he visited Glasgow, Derbyshire, West Sussex, as well as the London area. This postscript has been written within a day of his return by aeroplane and consequently is more impressionistic than the detailed analysis which he hopes to make in due course.