Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
The time is, I think, opportune for introspection by Canadian social scientists. The present is a transitional period in the life of the nation. Five years of war have profoundly altered Canadian society: Canada has become a great industrial nation; the paternalistic state has arrived at least at adolescence under the stimulus of war; for the time being the Canadian people have become military-minded, a condition which may well continue into the peace in view of the shift of world power in favour of North America; everywhere social values hitherto accepted are under fire, and traditional folkways have been rudely disturbed; new social goals are being raised and new patterns of life are being established.
It is probable also that we are in a transitional stage in higher education. At any rate Canadian universities, like other social institutions, will be compelled to adjust themselves to the changed conditions of the post-war world. One condition likely to obtain is an increasing interest in the social sciences, if for no other reason than the increasing demand for social technicians to manage a paternalistic society. It is not improbable also that Canadian society faces a prolonged and acrimonious, if not violent, debate on social objectives. Under these conditions I suggest it is of first importance that social scientists should have firm opinions as to the nature of their calling, both with 'a view to guiding educational expansion, and assisting them in deciding their personal responsibilities in a distracted world.
1 For recent contrary opinions, see Cutlin, G. E. G., The Science and Method of Politics (New York, 1927)Google Scholar, and Burnham, James, The Machiavellians (New York, 1943).Google Scholar
2 As one example of recent revision of theory, see Graham's, F. D. Economic Goals and Social Institutions (Princeton, 1943).Google Scholar
3 Autobiography, pp. 84-5.
4 Wright, Quincy (ed.), A Study of War (2 vois., Chicago, 1942).Google Scholar
5 Volume I of the Sirois Report (Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations, 1940) is also an example of group research.
6 Quoted Hook, Sidney, Towards the Understanding of Karl Marx: A Revolutionary Interpretation (London, 1933).Google Scholar