Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:31:55.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on David Easton's Approach to Political Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

R. C. Pratt
R. C. Pratt*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , August 1954 , pp. 371 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science (New York, 1953)Google Scholar, reviewed in this Journal, XX, no. 2, May, 1954, 272–4.

2 The Political System, 233.

3 Ibid., 231.

4 Ibid., 255.

5 Ibid., 262–3.

6 Ibid., 247.

7 To have the means of determining the “value” of conflicting value preferences means ipso facto to possess an acceptable standard. It is, however, specifically with cases where no such standard exists that the quotation is concerned.

8 This last point is a purely linguistic one. Any value which is defended by reference to another value is Q.E.D., not a primary value.