Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:20:38.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2005 emergency cardiovascular care guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Michael Shuster*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
*
Mineral Springs Hospital, Box 1050, Banff AB T1L 1H7; mtn1ms@poky.ca

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Education • Éducation
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2006

References

1.Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Subcommittees of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005;112:IV–1–IV–211.Google Scholar
2.International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation 2005;112(suppl III):III–1–III–136.Google Scholar
3.Paradis, NA, Martin, GB, Rivers, EP, et al. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1990;263:1106–13.Google Scholar
4.Kern, KB, Ewy, GA, Voorhees, WD, et al. Myocardial perfusion pressure: a predictor of 24-hour survival during prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Resuscitation 1988;16:241–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Halperin, HR, Tsitlik, JE, Guerci, AD, et al. Determinants of blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1986;73:539–50.Google Scholar
6.Abella, BS, Alvarado, JP, Myklebust, H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:305–10.Google Scholar
7.Wik, L, Kramer-Johansen, J, Myklebust, H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sanders, AB, Ogle, M, Ewy, GA. Coronary perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 1985;3:11–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Berg, RA, Sanders, AB, Kern, KB, et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001;104:2465–70.Google Scholar
10.Sanders ABea. Importance of the duration of inadequate coronary perfusion pressure on resuscitation from cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Assar, D, Chamberlain, D, Colquhoun, M, et al. Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support, 1: skill acquisition at bronze stage. Resuscitation 2000;45:715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Heidenreich, JW, Higdon, TA, Kern, KB, et alSingle-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “two quick breaths” — an oxymoron. Resuscitation 2004;62:283–9.Google Scholar
13.Swenson, RD, Weaver, WD, Niskanen, RA, et al. Hemodynamics in humans during conventional and experimental methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1988;78:630–9.Google Scholar
14.Kern, KB, Sanders, AB, Raife, J, et al. A study of chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:145–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Berg, RA, Cobb, LA, Doherty, A, et al. Chest compressions and basic life support-defibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37(4 suppl):S26–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Berg, RA, Hilwig, RW, Kern, KB, et al. Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillation: lethal delays of chest compressions before and after countershocks. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:458–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Kern, KB, Hilwig, RW, Berg, RA, et al. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002;105:645–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ewy, GA. Cardiocerebral resuscitation: the new cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2005;111:2134–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Berg, RA, Kern, KB, Hilwig, RW, et al. Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1997;95:1635–41.Google Scholar
20.Berg, RA, Kern, KB, Hilwig, RW, et al. Assisted ventilation during “bystander” CPR in a swine acute myocardial infarction model does not improve outcome. Circulation 1997;96:4364–71.Google Scholar
21.Berg, RA, Hilwig, RW, Kern, KB, et al. “Bystander” chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless “cardiac arrest.” Circulation 2000;101:1743–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Eftestol, T, Sunde, K, Steen, PA. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002;105:2270–3.Google Scholar
23.Handley, AJ, Handley, JA. The relationship between rate of chest compression and compression:relaxation ratio. Resuscitation 1995;30:237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Feneley, MP, Maier, GW, Kern, KB, et al. Influence of compression rate on initial success of resuscitation and 24 hour survival after prolonged manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Circulation 1988;77:240–50.Google Scholar
25.Sanders, AB, Kern, KB, Berg, RA, et al. Survival and neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different chest compression-ventilation ratios. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40:553–62.Google Scholar
26.Dorph, E, Wik, L, Stromme, TA, et al. Quality of CPR with three different ventilation:compression ratios. Resuscitation 2003;58:193201.Google Scholar
27.Greingor, JL. Quality of cardiac massage with ratio compression-ventilation 5/1 and 15/2. Resuscitation 2002;55:263–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Dorph, E, Wik, L, Stromme, TA, et al. Oxygen delivery and return of spontaneous circulation with ventilation:compression ratio 2:30 versus chest compressions only CPR in pigs. Resuscitation 2004;60:309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Babbs, CF, Kern, KB. Optimum compression to ventilation ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions: a physiological and mathematical analysis. Resuscitation 2002;54:147–57.Google Scholar
30.Dahl, CF, Ewy, GA, Ewy, MD, et al. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks. Med Instrum 1976;10:151–4.Google Scholar
31.Geddes, LA, Tacker, WA, Cabler, P, et al. The decrease in transthoracic impedance during successive ventricular defibrillation trials. Med Instrum 1975;9:179–80.Google ScholarPubMed
32.Bain, AC, Swerdlow, CD, Love, CJ, et al. Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:512.Google Scholar
33.Mittal, S, Ayati, S, Stein, KM, et al. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL In-vestigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1595–601.Google Scholar
34.Poole, JE, White, RD, Kanz, KG, et al. Low-energy impedancecompensating biphasic waveforms terminate ventricular fibrillation at high rates in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. LIFE Investigators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:1373–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Schneider, T, Martens, PR, Paschen, H, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Circulation 2000;102:1780–7.Google Scholar
36.van Alem, AP, Sanou, BT, Koster, RW. Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:449–57.Google Scholar
37.Martens, PR, Russell, JK, Wolcke, B, et al. Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects. Resuscitation 2001;49:233–43.Google Scholar
38.Carpenter, J, Rea, TD, Murray, JA, et al. Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003;59:189–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Gliner, BE, White, RD. Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation 1999;41:133–44.Google Scholar
40.White, RD, Blackwell, TH, Russell, JK, et al. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator. Resuscitation 2005;64:63–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Yu, T, Weil, MH, Tang, W, et al. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 2002;106:368–72.Google Scholar
42.Weaver, WD, Cobb, LA, Copass, MK, et al. Ventricular defibrillation: a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. N Engl JMed 1982;307:1101–6.Google Scholar
43.Eberle, B, Dick, WF, Schneider, T, et al. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse. Resuscitation 1996;33:107–16.Google Scholar
44.Moule, P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation 2000;44:195201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Eftestol, T, Wik, L, Sunde, K, Steen, PA. Effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrillation defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2004: 01.CIR.0000133323.15565.75.Google Scholar
46.Hess, E, White, R. Ventricular fibrillation is not provoked by chest compression during post-shock organized rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005;66:711.Google Scholar
47.Aung, K, Htay, T. Vasopressin for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1724.Google Scholar