Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:44:00.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cardioversion of uncomplicated paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a survey of practice by Canadian emergency physicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Bjug Borgundvaag  and
Howard Ovens
Bjug Borgundvaag*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Services, Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Howard Ovens
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Services, Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
*
Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Rm. 206, Emergency Physicians Office, Toronto ON M5G 1X5; b.borgundvaag@utoronto.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is the rhythm disturbance most commonly encountered by emergency physicians, yet the role played by emergency physicians in the management of this condition has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to describe the management of uncomplicated PAF by Canadian emergency physicians.

Methods:

All members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians with a Canadian address (n = 1255) were mailed a 15-point questionnaire regarding training/certification, hospital demographics and practice patterns regarding the management of uncomplicated PAF. Chisquared analysis and Fisher’s Exact test were performed to identify significant differences in reported practice patterns in relation to demographic variables. Significant associations were tested for interaction using the Mantel–Haenszel test.

Results:

We received 663 responses, representing a 52.8% response rate. Six hundred and twenty-two (95%), 514 (78%) and 242 (38%) respondents reported routine performance of rate control, chemical cardioversion and electrical cardioversion respectively. Physicians working in high-volume emergency departments (>50 000 visits/yr) were significantly more likely to self-manage rate control and chemical/electrical cardioversion than those working in lower volume emergency departments. Residency training was associated with higher performance of electrical (44% v. 31%, p < 0.01) but not chemical cardioversion or rate control, although, amongst residency trained physicians, those with FRCP-level training were significantly more likely to perform both chemical (86% v. 76%, p < 0.05) and electrical (57% v. 37%, p < 0.01) cardioversion.

Conclusion:

Canadian emergency physicians surveyed in this study actively manage uncomplicated PAF. We found significant variations in practice, especially related to the use of electrical cardioversion. This may reflect different practice environments, levels of training, and lack of evidence to guide best practice. Further research is required to determine the optimal care of PAF in the emergency department setting.

Keywords

paroxysmal atrial fibrillationemergency managementcardioversion
Type
EM Advances • Innovations en MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Kannel, WB, Wolf, PA, Benjamin, EJ, Levy, D.Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol 1998;82(8A):2N–9N.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Yealy, DM, Delbridge, TR.Dysrhythmias. In: Marx, JA, Hockberger, RS, Walls, RM, editors. Rosen’s emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practic, vol 2. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002. p. 1083–6.Google Scholar
3.Prystowsky, EN, Benson, DW Jr, Fuster, V, Hart, RG, Kay, GN, Myerburg, RJ, et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A statement for healthcare professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology. American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;93(6):1262–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Fuster, V, Ryden, LE, Asinger, RW, Cannom, DS, Crijns, HJ, Frye, RL, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in Collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38(4):1231–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischemia. The European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333(1):5–10.Google Scholar
6.Michael, JA, Stiell, IG, Agarwal, S, Mandavia, DP.Cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33(4):379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Dillman, DA.Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000.Google Scholar
8.Godtfredsen, J.Atrial fibrillation: etiology, course and prognosis: a follow-up study of 1212 cases. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1975.Google Scholar
9.Crozier, IG, Ikram, H, Kenealy, M, Levy, L.Flecainide acetate for conversion of acute supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1987;59(6):607–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Crijns, HJ, van Wijk, LM, van Gilst, WH, Kingma, JH, van Gelder, IC, Lie, KI.Acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: clinical efficacy of flecainide acetate. Comparison of two regimens. Eur Heart J 1988;9(6):634–8.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Suttorp, MJ, Kingma, JH, Lie, AHL, Mast, EG.Intravenous flecainide versus verapamil for acute conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1989;63(11):693–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Suttorp, MJ, Kingma, JH, Jessurun, ER, Lie, AHL, van Hemel, NM, Lie, KI.The value of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs for acute conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter to sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16(7):1722–7.Google Scholar
13.Gold, RL, Haffajee, CI, Charos, G, Sloan, K, Baker, S, Alpert, JS.Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1986;57(1):124–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Waris, E, Kreus, KE, Salokannel, J.Factors influencing persistence of sinus rhythm after DC shock treatment of atrial fibrillation. Acta Medica Scandinavica 1971;189(3):161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Van Gelder, IC, Crijns, HJ, Van Gilst, WH, Verwer, R, Lie, KI.Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991;68(1):41–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Resnekov, L, McDonald, L.Appraisal of electroconversion in treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias. Br Heart J 1968;30(6):786–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Crijns, HJ, Van Gelder, IC, Van Gilst, WH, Hillege, H, Gosselink, AM, Lie, KI.Serial antiarrhythmic drug treatment to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991;68(4):335–41.Google Scholar
18.Wijffels, MC, Kirchhof, CJ, Dorland, R, Allessie, MA.Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 1995;92(7):1954–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Daoud, EG, Bogun, F, Goyal, R, Harvey, M, Man, KC, Strickberger, SA, et al. Effect of atrial fibrillation on atrial refractoriness in humans. Circulation 1996;94(7):1600–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Goette, A, Honeycutt, C, Langberg, JJ.Electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Time course and mechanisms. Circulation 1996;94(11):2968–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Daoud, EG, Marcovitz, P, Knight, BP, Goyal, R, Man, KC, Strickberger, SA, et al. Short-term effect of atrial fibrillation on atrial contractile function in humans. Circulation 1999;99(23):3024–7.Google Scholar
22.Mattioli, AV, Tarabini Castellani, E, Vivoli, D, Molinari, R, Mattioli, G.Restoration of atrial function after atrial fibrillation of different etiological origins. Cardiology 1996;87(3):205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Khan, IA.Transient atrial mechanical dysfunction (stunning) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am Heart J 2002;144(1):11–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Kapur, AK.Emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [abstract]. Can J Emerg Med 2001;3(2):138.Google Scholar
25.Gosselink, AT, Crijns, HJ, van den Berg, MP, van den Broek, SA, Hillege, H, Landsman, ML, et al. Functional capacity before and after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a controlled study. Br Heart J 1994;72(2):161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Dorian, P, Paquette, M, Newman, D, Green, M, Connolly, SJ, Talajic, M, et al. Quality of life improves with treatment in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 2002;143(6):984–90.Google Scholar
27.Wyse, DG, Waldo, AL, DiMarco, JP, Domanski, MJ, Rosenberg, Y, Schron, EB, et al; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347(23):1825–33.Google Scholar
28.Van Gelder, IC, Hagens, VE, Bosker, HA, Kingma, JH, Kamp, O, Kingma, T, et al; Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent trial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347(23):1834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Hohnloser, SH, Kuck, KH, Lilienthal, J.Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet 2000;356(9244): 1789–94.Google Scholar