We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, McGill University Health Centre
Jerrald Dankoff
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
*
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, McGill University Health Centre, 687 Pine Avenue West, Room A4.62, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1; Joshua.guttman@mail.mcgill.ca
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1.Kabrhel, C, Matts, C, McNamara, C, et al. A highly sensitive ELISA D-dimer increases testing but not diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med2006;13:519–24, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01002.x.Google Scholar
2
2.Kline, JA, Courtney, DM, Beam, DM, et al. Incidence and predictors of repeated computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med2009;54:41–8, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3
3.Wells, PS, Anderson, DR, Rodger, M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients’ probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost2000;83:416–20.Google ScholarPubMed
4
4.Wicki, J, Perneger, TV, Junod, AF, et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med2001;161:92–7, doi:10.1001/archinte.161.1.92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5
5.Kline, JA, Nelson, RD, Jackson, RE, et al. Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med2002;39:144–52, doi:10.1067/mem.2002.121398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6
6.Kline, JA, Mitchell, AM, Kabrhel, C, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost2004;2:124755, doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7
7.Wells, PS, Anderson, DR, Rodger, M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med2001;135:98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
8.LeGal, G, Righini, M, Roy, PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med2006;144:165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9
9.Runyon, MS, Richman, PB, Kline, JA, et al. Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med2007;14:53–7, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb00371.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Blanco-Molina, A, Rota, LL, Di Micco, P, et al. RIETE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy, postpartum or during contraceptive use. Thromb Haemost2010;103:306–11, doi:10.1160/TH09-08-0559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12
12.Stein, PD, Hull, RD, Kayali, F. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: 21-year trends. Am J Med2004;117:121–5, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13
13.Miniati, M, Bottai, M, Monti, S, et al. Simple and accurate prediction of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2008;178:290–4, doi:10.1164/rccm.200802-207OC.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed