Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:04:58.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impaired driving charges in injured impaired drivers requiring treatment in an emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Warren Fieldus  and
Ed Cain
Warren Fieldus*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, HI 355, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7;wfieldus@dal.ca.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To determine the percentage of injured impaired drivers brought to the only trauma centre in Nova Scotia who were charged with impaired driving.

Methods:

This retrospective observational study identified alcohol impaired drivers involved in a motor vehicle crash (MVC) brought to the emergency department (ED). Patients were selected based on blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) found to be above the legal limit. Medical records were examined to determine if the patient was the driver in an MVC. Patient records were then cross-referenced with a police database to determine the percentage of injured impaired drivers who were charged with impaired driving.

Results:

Between April 1, 2006, and April 1, 2008, 1,102 patients brought to the QEII Health Sciences Centre (QEII HSC) ED were found to have BACs over the legal limit. Of these patients, only 57 (5.2%) were found to have been the driver in an MVC. The majority of patients were male (49; 86%), with an average age of 32 years. Most injuries (51; 89.5%) were the result of a single-vehicle crash. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.6, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 14.4. Cross-referencing with police records showed that only 22.8% (13 of 57) of injured drivers were charged with impaired driving. Those drivers not charged with impaired driving had a significantly lower median BAC and median age.

Conclusion:

During the study, the majority of alcoholimpaired drivers injured in an MVC who were brought to the QEII HSC ED for assessment of their injuries were not charged with impaired driving.

Keywords

alcohol-impaired drivingemergency departmentimpaired driving charges
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 290 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2012

References

REFERENCES

1.Mercer, G. Estimating the presence of alcohol and drug impairment in traffic crashes and their costs to Canadians 1999 to 2006. Produced for MADD Canada by Applied Research and Evaluation Services (ARES), University of British Columbia. February 2009.Google Scholar
2.Purssell, RA, Brown, D, Brubacher, J, et al. Proportion of injured drivers presenting to a tertiary care emergency department who engage in future impaired driving activities. Traffic Inj Prev 2010;11:35–42, doi:10.1080/15389580903419125.Google Scholar
3.Rauch, WJ. Risk of alcohol-impaired driving recidivism among first offenders and multiple offenders. Am J Public Health 2010;100:919–24, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.154575.Google Scholar
4.McKnight, AJ, Voas, RB. The effect of license suspension upon DWI recidivism. Alcohol Drugs Driving 1991;7:43–54.Google Scholar
5.Kunitz, S, Woodall, W, Zhao, H, et al. Re-arrest rates after incarceration for DWI: a comparative study in a southwestern US country. Am J Public Health 2002;92:1826–31, doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.11.1826.Google Scholar
6.Wells-Parker, E, Bangert-Drowns, R, McMillen, R, et al. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995;90:907–26, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03500.x.Google Scholar
7.Maull, K, Kinning, L, Hickman, J. Culpability and accountability of hospitalized injured alcohol impaired drivers. JAMA 1984;252:1880–3, doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350140026019.Google Scholar
8.Biffl, WL, Schiffman, JD, Harrington, DT, et al. Legal prosecution of alcohol-impaired drivers admitted to a level I trauma center in Rhode Island. J Trauma 2004;56:24–9, doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000108632.51898.DB.Google Scholar
9.Krause, K, Howells, G, Bair, H, et al. Prosecution and conviction of the injured intoxicated driver. J Trauma 1998; 45:1069–72, doi:10.1097/00005373-199812000-00016.Google Scholar
10.Cydulka, R, Harmody, M, Barnoski, A, et al. Injured intoxicated drivers: citation, conviction, referral and recidivism rates. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:349–52, doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70012-5.Google Scholar
11.Lahn, M, Gallagher, J, Li, S, et al. Prospective confirmation of low arrest rates among intoxicated drivers in motor vehicle crashes. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:260–3, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01071.x.Google Scholar
12.Purssell, RA, Yarema, M, Wilson, J, et al. Proportion of injured alcohol-impaired drivers subsequently convicted of an impaired driving criminal code offence in British Columbia. CJEM 2004;6:80–8.Google Scholar
13.Goecke, M, Kirpatrick, A, Laupland, K, et al. Characteristics and conviction rates of injured alcohol impaired drivers admitted to a tertiary care Canadian trauma center. Clin Investig Med 2007;30:26–32.Google Scholar
14.Purssell, RA. Emergency departments: are they considered a safe haven from prosecution for impaired drivers involved in fatal or personal injury crashes? BC Med J 2010;52:477–9.Google Scholar
15.Chang, S. The injured intoxicated driver: analysis of the conviction process. J Trauma 2001;51:551–6, doi:10.1097/00005373-200109000-00023.Google Scholar