Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:40:35.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Medical myth: The usefulness of pelvic exam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Paul Rosenberg*
Affiliation:
Toronto, Ont

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters • Courrier
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Brown, T, Herbert, M.Medical myth: Bimanual pelvic examination is a reliable decision aid in the investigation of acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. Can J Emerg Med 2003;5(2):1202.Google Scholar
2.Close, RJH, Sachs, CJ, Dyne, PL.Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med 2001;175:2404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Padilla, LA, Radosevich, DM, Milad, MP.Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:5938.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Jacobson, L.Differential diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:100611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Eschenbach, DA.Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:142S52S.Google Scholar
6.Houry, D, Abbott, JT.Ovarian torsion: a fifteen year review. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Dart, RG, Kaplan, B, Varaklis, K.Predictive value of history and physical examination in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:28390.Google Scholar
8.Andolf, E, Joergensen, C.A prospective comparison of clinical ultrasound and operative examination of the female pelvis. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:61720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Frederick, JL, Paulson, RJ, Sauer, MV.Routine use of vaginal ultrasonography in the preoperative evaluation of gynecologic patients. J Reprod Med 1991;36:77982.Google Scholar