Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:56:37.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The need for a national emergency health services database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Sherry Kennedy ,
Wendy Young ,
Michael J. Schull  and
Winston Isaac
Sherry Kennedy
Affiliation:
Ryerson University, Toronto, Ont.
Wendy Young*
Affiliation:
Ryerson University, Toronto, Ont. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Michael J. Schull
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ont. Emergency and Critical Care Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
Winston Isaac
Affiliation:
Ryerson University, Toronto, Ont. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
*
Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St., Toronto ON M5B 2K3; wyoung@ryerson.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

In February 2007, the Health Council of Canada, in its third annual report, emphasized the need for pan-Canadian data on our health care system. To date, no studies have examined the strengths and weaknesses of emergency health services (EHS) administrative databases, as perceived by researchers. We undertook a qualitative study to determine, from a researcher's perspective, the strengths and weaknesses of EHS administrative databases. The study also elicited researchers' suggestions to improve these databases.

Methods:

We conducted taped interviews with 4 Canadian health services researchers. The transcriptions were subsequently examined for common concepts, which were finalized after discussion with all the investigators.

Results:

Five common themes emerged from the interviews: clinical detail, data quality, data linkage, data use and population coverage. Data use and data linkages were considered strengths. Clinical detail, data quality and population coverage were considered weaknesses.

Conclusion:

The 5 themes that emerged from this study all serve to reinforce the call from the Health Council of Canada for national data on emergency services, which could be readily captured through a national EHS administrative database. We feel that key stakeholders involved in emergency services across Canada should work together to develop a strategy to implement an accurate, clinically detailed, integrated and comprehensive national EHS database.

Keywords

administrative dataemergency health servicesqualitative studyCanada
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 120 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Rowe, BH, Bond, K, Ospina, M, et al. Data collection on patients in emergency departments in Canada. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Spasoff, RA. Epidemiologic methods for health policy. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
3.Innes, G, Murray, M, Grafstein, E; Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Working Group. A consensus-based process to define standard national data elements for a Canadian emergency department information system. CJEM 2001;4:277–84.Google Scholar
4.Stanford, RH, Shen, Y, McLaughlin, T. Cost of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department and hospital: an analysis of administrative data from 218 US hospitals. Treat Respir Med 2006;5:343–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Lee, TA, Fuhlbrigge, AL, Sullivan, SD, et al. Agreement between caregiver reported healthcare utilization and administrative data for children with asthma. J Asthma 2007;44:189–94.Google Scholar
6.Han, JH, Zhou, C, France, DJ, et al. The effect of emergency department expansion on emergency department overcrowding. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:338–43.Google Scholar
7.Macpherson, AK, Schull, MJ. Penetrating trauma in Ontario emergency departments: a population-based study. CJEM 2007;9:16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.DuBard, CA, Massing, MW. Trends in emergency Medicaid expenditures for recent and undocumented immigrants. JAMA 2007;297:1085–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Chan, B, Schull, M, Schultz, S. Emergency department services in Ontario. Toronto (ON): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2001.Google Scholar
10.MacPherson, A, Schull, M, Manuel, D, et al. Injuries in Ontario. Toronto (ON): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2005.Google Scholar
11.Kim, S, Clark, S, Camargo, CA Jr. Mortality after an emergency department visit for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD 2006;3:75–81.Google Scholar
12.Sullivan, G, Han, X, Moore, S, et al. Disparities in hospitalization for diabetes among persons with and without co-occurring mental disorders. Psychiatr Serv 2006;57:1126–31.Google Scholar
13.Guttmann, A, Razzaq, A, Lindsay, P, et al. Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process. Pediatrics 2006;118:114–23.Google Scholar
14.Wyer, PC, Brown, MD, Newman, DH, et al. Evidence, values, communication: essential ingredients of shared emergency medicine decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:690–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Zed, PJ, Rowe, BH, Loewen, PS. bu-Laban, RB. Systematic reviews in emergency medicine: Part II. Critical appraisal of review quality, data synthesis and result interpretation. CJEM 2003;5:406–11.Google Scholar
16.Zed, PJ, Rowe, BH, Loewen, PS. bu-Laban, RB. Systematic reviews in emergency medicine: Part I. Background and general principles for locating and critically appraising reviews. CJEM 2003;5:331–5.Google Scholar
17.Colman, I, Yiannakoulias, N, Schopflocher, D, et al. Population-based study of medically treated self-inflicted injuries. CJEM 2004;6:313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Worster, A, Rowe, BH, Stiell, IG, et al. Clinical research in the emergency department conducted by non-emergency physicians: potential problems and proposed recommendations. CJEM 2005;7:241–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Rowe, BH, Brown, MD. A primer on the Cochrane Collaboration, its new priorities in out-of-hospital and emergency health, and the role of Annals of Emergency Medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:351–4.Google Scholar
20.Rowe, BH, Bond, K, Ospina, MB, et al. Data collection on patients in emergency departments in Canada. CJEM 2006;8:417–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Merton, RK, Lowenthal, MF, Kendall, PL. The focused interview: a manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe (IL): Free Press; 1956.Google Scholar
22.The Health Council of Canada. Health care renewal in Canada: Measuring up? Toronto (ON): The Council; 2007.Google Scholar