Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:59:56.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P101: Needs assessment study for the inter-professional procedural sedation course: methods of adult procedural sedation (MAPS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2016

S. Perelman
Affiliation:
Schwartz-Reisman Emergency Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON
J.C. Munzar
Affiliation:
Schwartz-Reisman Emergency Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON
M. Misch
Affiliation:
Schwartz-Reisman Emergency Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is a common practice for non-anaesthesiologists. While complication rates for PSA are low, many of them are preventable. Professional regulatory body requirements state that practitioners should have adequate knowledge and skills to safely administer PSA. However, no certification process currently exists to develop and maintain these competencies. A standardized PSA training course would help close the gap between the best evidence for safe administration of PSA and its implementation in everyday practice. Therefore, we conducted a needs assessment to guide the development of such a PSA training course. Methods: Using modified Dillman methodology, an electronic survey was sent to a convenience sample of 50 potential learners and two groups of stakeholders: 20 hospital administrators and 35 experts in PSA. Questions assessed practice demographics, experience as well as support and interest in the development and attendance of a PSA training course. Prior to distribution, the questionnaire was peer reviewed and pilot-tested for feasibility and comprehension. Responses were stratified based on clinical role. Results: 35 potential learners completed the needs assessment (70% response rate): 15 emergency physicians, 19 registered nurses and 1 nurse practitioner. 48% have been in practice for over 10 years and over 90% participate in PSA at least weekly. 38% received informal training in PSA while 16% obtained no training at all. 86% strongly supported the development of a PSA certification course and were in favour of an inter-professional format. 13 experts responded to the questionnaire within the departments of anesthesia, emergency medicine (EM) and respiratory therapy (37% response rate). 80% supported the need for a PSA training course. 6 hospital administrators responded to the questionnaire within the departments of anesthesia, EM, gastroenterology and respirology (30% response rate). All agreed that standardization of PSA is an important part of patient safety and 80% stated certification in PSA should be a prerequisite for granting privileges to health care professionals to participate in PSA. 60% believed the course should be developed and supported by hospital funds. Conclusion: There is strong support from potential learners and stakeholders for the development of a formal PSA training course.

Type
Posters Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2016