Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:30:32.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehospital emergency medical services’ ethical dilemma with do-not-resuscitate orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Jonathan Sherbino ,
Veena Guru ,
P. Richard Verbeek  and
Laurie J. Morrison
Jonathan Sherbino
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Veena Guru
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
P. Richard Verbeek
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, and Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto
Laurie J. Morrison*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, and Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto
*
Division of Emergency Medicine, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., BG-20, Toronto ON M4N 3M5; fax 416 480–4911, phc.research@utoronto.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Our primary objectives were to estimate how frequently emergency medical technicians with defibrillation skills (EMT-Ds) are forced to deal with prehospital do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, to assess their comfort in doing so, and to describe the prehospital care provided to patients with DNR orders in a system without a prehospital DNR policy (i.e., where resuscitation is mandatory).

Methods:

Using Dillman methodology, the authors developed a 13-item survey and mailed it to 382 of 764 EMT-Ds in the metropolitan Toronto area. Responses were evaluated using 5-point Likert scales, limited-option and open-ended questions. Narrative responses were categorized. Two authors independently categorized narrative responses from 20 surveys, and kappa values for agreement beyond chance were determined.

Results:

Among 382 EMT-Ds surveyed, 236 (62%) responded, of whom 221 (94%) answered the questionnaire. Overall, 126 of 219 (58%) indicated that they were called to resuscitate patients with DNR orders “sometimes,” “frequently,” or “all the time.” In such situations, 22 of 207 (11%) stated they would honour the DNR order and 55 of 207 (27%) would honour the order but appear to provide basic resuscitation, in order to adhere to mandatory resuscitation regulations. Willingness to honour a DNR order did not vary by years of emergency medical service. EMT-Ds cited concern for the family and the patient, fear of repercussions and conflict with personal ethics as key factors contributing to this ethical dilemma. If legally allowed to honour DNR orders, 212 of 221 (96%) respondents would be comfortable with a written order and 137 of 220 (62%) with a verbal order.

Conclusion:

Prehospital DNR orders are common, and a significant number of EMT-Ds disregard current regulations by honouring them. EMT-Ds would be more comfortable with written than verbal DNR orders. An ethical prehospital DNR policy should be developed and applied.

Keywords

emergency medical servicesresuscitation ordersmedical ethics
Type
EM Advances • Progrès De La MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 2000 , pp. 246 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2000

References

1.Hall, S.An analysis of dilemmas posed by prehospital DNR orders. J Emerg Med 1997;15:109–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.American College of Emergency Physicians. “Do not attempt resuscitation” directives in the out-of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:684.Google Scholar
3.Emergency Health Services. Manual of operational directives and guidelines —emergency health services. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health; 1997.Google Scholar
4.Dull, SM., Graves, JR., Larsen, MP., Cummins, RO.Expected death and unwanted resuscitation in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:997–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Schmidt, TA., Harrahill, MA.Family response to out-of-hospital death. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:513–8.Google Scholar
6.Fitzgerald, DJ., Milzman, DP., Sulmasy, DP.Creating a dignified option: ethical considerations in the formulation of prehospital DNR protocol. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13:223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Iserson, KV.Foregoing prehospital care: Should ambulance staff always resuscitate? J Med Ethics 1991;17:19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Dillman, DA.Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York: Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
9.Gilbert, EH., Lowenstein, SR., Koziol-McLain, J., Barta, DC., Steiner, J.Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:305–8.Google Scholar
10.Cohen, J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.Google Scholar
11.Landis, JR., Koch, GG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.Google Scholar
12.Adams, JG., Arnold, R., Siminoff, L., Wolfson, AB.Ethical conflicts in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1259–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Johnson, DR., Maggiore, WA.Resuscitation decision making by New Mexico emergency medical technicians. Am J Emerg Med 1993;11:139–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Partridge, RA., Virk, A., Sayah, A., Antosia, R.Field experience with prehospital advance directives. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:589–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Sosna, DP, Christopher, M., Pesto, MM., Morando, DV., Stoddard, J.Implementation strategies for a do-not-resuscitate program in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:1042–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.American College of Emergency Physicians. Guidelines for “do not resuscitate” orders in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:1106–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sachs, GA., Miles, SH., Levin, RA.Limiting resuscitation: emerging policy in the emergency medical system. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:151–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Crabtree, JP., Lo, AM.Honoring the right to die in medical emergencies. Hawaii Med J 1995;54:476–7.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Smith, G.New EMS palliative care/DNR protocol will replace existing hospice protocol. Md Med J 1995;44:717–22.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Harty-Golder, B.Outpatient DNR. J Fla Med Assoc 1994;81:124–6.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Rausch, PG., Ramzy, AI.Development of a palliative care protocol for emergency medical services [editorial]. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1383–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Sager, MA., Easterling, DV., Kindig, DA., Anderson, OW.Changes in the location of death after passage of Medicare’s prospective payment system. A national study. N Engl J Med 1989;320:433–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed