Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:48:10.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radial head subluxation: How long do children wait in the emergency department before reduction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2018

Philippe Toupin ,
Martin H. Osmond ,
Rhonda Correll  and
Amy Plint
Philippe Toupin
Affiliation:
School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
Martin H. Osmond*
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
Rhonda Correll
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont
Amy Plint
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
*
Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd., Ottawa ON K1H 8L1; osmond@cheo.on.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To describe the current emergency department (ED) wait times and treatment characteristics of children with radial head subluxation (RHS).

Methods:

We performed a 2-year retrospective medical record review (April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2006) of all children who presented to our tertiary care pediatric ED with a discharge diagnosis of RHS, pulled elbow, dislocated elbow or nursemaid's elbow.

Results:

We identified 501 cases of RHS in 427 children over a 2-year period. The mean age was 2.4 years (range 22 d–9.7 yr) and the injury was caused by a pull in 314 (62.8%) cases, a fall in 91 (18.2%) cases and a twist in 20 (4.0%) of the cases. The median time from triage to physician assessment was 1.3 hours, with 112 (23.5%) patients waiting > 2 hours and 33 (6.9%) waiting > 3 hours. The median time from triage to ED discharge was 1.7 hours, with 193 (41.2%) staying > 2 hours, 85 (18.1%) staying > 3 hours and 30 (6.4%) staying > 4 hours. Overall, 490 (99.2%) of these injuries were reduced in the ED: 98 (19.8%) were reduced prior to physician assessment and 309 (89.6%) were reduced on the first attempt. The technique used was pronation in 138 (52.7%), supination in 100 (38.2%), and pronation and supination in 24 (9.2%) cases.

Conclusion:

This large cohort indicates that children with RHS often have long ED waits before reduction and discharge. The majority of children with RHS are treated successfully with 1 reduction attempt. The data from this study will be used in planning a prospective study to shorten ED visits for patients with RHS.

Keywords

emergency departmentchildrenradial head subluxationpulled elbownursemaid's elbowdislocated elbowwait time
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 333 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1. Schutzman, SA, Teach S. Upper extremity impairment in young children. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:474–9.Google Scholar
2. Salter, R, Zaltz, C. Anatomic investigation of the mechanisms of injury and pathological anatomy of pulled elbow in young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1971;77:134–43.Google Scholar
3. Quan, L, Marcuse, EK. The epidemiology and treatment of radial head subluxation. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139:1194–7.Google Scholar
4. Teach, SJ, Schutzman, SA. Prospective study of recurrent radial head subluxation. Arch Pediatr Adoles Med 1996;150:164–6.Google Scholar
5. Jongschaap, HCN, Young, GG, Beattie, TF. The epidemiology of radial head subluxation ('pulled elbow’) in the Aberdeen city area. Health Bull (Edinb) 1990;48:58–61.Google Scholar
6. Macias, CG, Bothner, J, Wiebe, R. A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations. Pediatrics 1998;102:el0.Google Scholar
7. Schunk, JE. Radial head subluxation: epidemiology and treatment of 87 episodes. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1019–23.Google Scholar
8. McDonald, J, Whitelaw, C, Goldsmith, LJ. Radial head subluxation: comparing two methods of reduction. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:715–8.Google Scholar
9. Taha, AM. The treatment of pulled elbow: a prospective randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120:336–7.Google Scholar
10. Chan, B, Schull, M, Schultz, S. Emergency department services in Ontario. Toronto (ON): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2001.Google Scholar
11. Bursch, B, Beezy, J, Shaw, R. Emergency department satisfaction: What matters most? Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:586–91.Google Scholar
12. Gilbert, EH, Lowenstein, SR, Koziol-McLain, J, et al. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:305–8.Google Scholar
13. Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.Google Scholar
14. Amir, D, Frankl, U, Pogrund, H. Pulled elbow and hypermobility of joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 257:94–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Choung, W, Heinrich, SD. Acute annular ligament interposition into the radiocapitellar joint in children (nursemaid's elbow). J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:454–6.Google Scholar
16. Sacchetti, A, Ramoska, EE. Glascow, C. Nonclassic history in children with radial head subluxations. J Emerg Med 1990;8:151–3.Google Scholar
17. Snyder, HS. Radiographic changes with radial head subluxation in children. J Emerg Med 1990;8:265–9.Google Scholar
18. Green, DA, Linares, M, Garcia, Pena BM, et al. Randomized comparison of pain perception during radial head subluxation reduction using supination-flexion or forced pronation. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006;22:235–8.Google Scholar
19. Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med 1999;1(Suppl 3). Available: www.caep.ca. Google Scholar
20. Kaplan, RE, Lillis, KA. Recurrent nursemaid's elbow (annual ligament displacement) treatment via telephone. Pediatrics 2002; 110:171–4.Google Scholar
21. Fry, M, Holdgate, A. Nurse-initiated intravenous morphine in the emergency department: efficacy, rate of adverse events and impact on time to analgesia. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002; 14:249–54.Google Scholar
22. Klassen, TP, Ropp, LJ, Sutcliffe, T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of radiograph ordering for extremity trauma in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1524–9.Google Scholar
23. Tambimuttu, J, Hawley, R, Marshall, A. Nurse-initiated x-ray of isolated limb fractures in the emergency department: research outcomes and future directions. Aust Crit Care 2002; 15:119–22.Google Scholar
24. Wilmshurst, P, Purchase, A, Webb, C, et al. Quinn, T. Improving door to needle times with nurse initiated thrombolysis. Heart 2000;84:262–6.Google Scholar
25. Salt, P, Clancy, M. Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses working in an accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med 1997;14:363–5.Google Scholar
26. Karpas, A, Hennes, H, Walsh-Kelly, CM. Utilization of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:130–3.Google Scholar
27. Cooper, MA, Lindsay, GM, Kinn, S, et al. Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 2002;40:721–30.Google Scholar
28. Rhee, KJ, Dermyer, AL. Patient satisfaction with a nurse practitioner in a university emergency service. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:130–2.Google Scholar