Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:22:27.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk stratification of patients with syncope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

James Quinn
James Quinn*
Affiliation:
Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
*
Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 701 Welch Rd., Suite C103, Palo Alto CA 94304; quinnj@stanford.edu

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary • Commentaire
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 174 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1.Kapoor, WN, Karpf, M, Wieand, S, et al. A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope. N Engl J Med 1983;309:197–204.Google Scholar
2.Soteriades, ES, Evans, JC, Larson, MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002;347:878–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Quinn, JV, Stiell, IG, McDermott, DA, et al. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:224–32.Google Scholar
4.Quinn, JV, McDermott, D, Stiell, I, et al. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:448–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Quinn, JV, McDermott, D. Medical decision making and the San Francisco Syncope Rule. [author reply 763]. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:762–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cosgriff, T, Kelly, A-M, Kerr, D. External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in the Australian context. Can J Emerg Med 2007;9:157–61.Google Scholar
7.Blanc, JJ, L’Her, C, Touiza, A, et al. Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J 2002;23:815–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Ammirati, F, Colivicchi, F, Santini, M. Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice. Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial-the OESIL 2 study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:935–40.Google Scholar
9.Quinn, JV, Stiell, IG, McDermott, DA, et al. San Francisco Syncope Rule vs. physician judgment and decision making. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:782–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Sun, BC, Emond, JA, Camargo, CA Jr., Direct medical costs of syncope-related hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:668–71.Google Scholar
11.Martin, TP, Hanusa, BH, Kapoor, WN. Risk stratification of patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:459–66.Google Scholar
12.Colivicchi, F, Ammirati, F, Melina, D, et al. Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J 2003;24:811–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Sarasin, FP, Hanusa, BH, Perneger, T, et al. A risk score to predict arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:1312–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Middlekauff, HR, Stevenson, WG, Stevenson, LW, et al. Syncope in advanced heart failure: high risk of sudden death regardless of origin of syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:110–6.Google Scholar