Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:06.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Regulation, and Safety Crime: Exploring the Boundaries of Criminalizing Powerful Corporate Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Steven Bittle  and
Laureen Snider
Steven Bittle
Affiliation:
Department of CriminologyUniversity of Ottawasbittle@uottawa.ca
Laureen Snider
Affiliation:
Department of SociologyQueen’s Universitysniderl@queensu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article interrogates the laws that govern safety crimes, harmful but typically unintentional acts of negligence that occur in the production of goods and services. Acts that injure employees at work are commonly depicted in legal discourses as accidents and penalized through administrative laws, although other negligent acts such as driving offences causing injury or death are treated as potentially criminal events. Through a discourse analysis of legal and regulatory texts and documents, the authors argue that the constitution of workplace safety crime is rooted in complex historical factors that shape state responses to corporate wrongdoing. This article documents the roots of this “common sense” view of workplace crime, empirically focusing on Canadian corporate negligence law, and concludes with tentative strategies of resistance and change.

Résumé

Cet article remet en question les lois concernant les crimes de sécurité, qui sont le plus souvent le résultat d’une négligence délétère mais involontaire dans le processus de production de biens et de services. Les actions qui se soldent par des blessures de travailleurs sont souvent décrites juridiquement comme des accidents et pénalisées par voie administrative, alors que d’autres actions négligentes, comme les infractions au volant causant des blessures ou la mort, sont traitées comme des actes potentiellement criminels. Grâce à une analyse des textes et documents législatifs et réglementaires, les auteurs affirment que la constitution des crimes de sécurité au travail se fonde sur une série de facteurs historiques complexes qui conditionnent la réaction des gouvernements aux fautes commises par les sociétés. L’article documente les origines de cette vision « du bon sens » de la criminalité en milieu de travail en se concentrant de façon empirique sur le droit de la négligence des entreprises au Canada, et conclut sur des pistes de stratégies de résistance et de changement.

Keywords

corporate crimesafety crimesregulationgovernancedriving offencescriminalité des entreprisescrimes de sécuritéréglementationgouvernanceinfractions au volant
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , December 2015 , pp. 445 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altheide, D. L. 1996. Qualitative Media Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, T., Jull, K., and Roach, K.. 2004. “The Changed Face of Corporate Criminal Liability.” Criminal Law Quarterly 48: 367–96.Google Scholar
Archibald, T.,Jull, K., and Roach, K... 2014. “Corporate Criminal Liability: Myriad Complexity in the Scope of Senior Officer.” Criminal Law Quarterly 60: 387–413.Google Scholar
Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada. “Injury Statistics.” http://awcbc.org/?page_id=14 (accessed March 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Bittle, S. 2012. Still Dying for a Living: Corporate Criminal Liability after the Westray Mine Disaster. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittle, S., and Snider, L.. 2006. “From Manslaughter to Preventable Accident: Shaping Corporate Criminal Liability.” Law and Policy 28 (4): 470–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” The Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–53.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2005. Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, K., Pontell, H., and Tillman, R.. 1997. Big Money Crime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Canadian Encyclopedic Digest. 2008. Volume 16 (4th ed.). Toronto: Thomson Reuters Canada.Google Scholar
Carson, W. G. 1980. “The Institutionalization of Ambiguity: Early British Factory Acts,” in White-Collar Crime Theory and Research, edited by Geis, G. and Stotland, E.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, E., and Solomon, R. 2012. “Drug-Impaired Driving in Canada: Review and Recommendations.” Mothers Against Drunk Driving.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. 2007. “Police Fear ‘Inevitable’ Deaths Without Stiffer Street Racing Fines.” Calgary Herald, April 13.Google Scholar
Chevalier, K., and Kmiec, K.. “Fine Against Metron Nearly Quadrupled by Ontario Court of Appeal.” Stikeman Elliott (Law Firm). http://www.canadianemploymentpensionlaw.com/fine-against-metron-construction-nearly-quadrupled-by-ontario-court-of-appeal/ (accessed March 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Department of Justice Canada. 2002. Corporate Criminal Liability: Discussion Paper. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.Google Scholar
Department of Justice Canada. 2003. Criminal Liability of Organizations: A Plain Language Guide to Bill C-45. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.Google Scholar
Department of Justice Canada. Discussion paper: Modernizing the Transportation Provisions of the Criminal Code, 2009. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/mtpcc-mdccmt/mtpcc.pdf (accessed September 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A. “Metron Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges, Crown Seeks $1M Penalty.” cos-mag.com/Legal/…/metron-pleads-guilty-to-criminal-charges-crown-seeks-$1m-penalty.html (accessed September 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A., and Conlin, R. J.. 2006. “First Corporate Charged with Workplace Safety Crime Post Bill C-45.” OH&S Due Diligence Update. Toronto, Ontario: Stringer Brisbin Humphrey, Management Lawyers.Google Scholar
Fanelli, C., and Evans, B., eds. 2013. Great Recession-Proof? Shattering the Myth of Canadian Exceptionalism. Ottawa: Red Quill Books.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbeek, H. 2002. Wealth by Stealth: Corporate Crime, Corporate Law, and the Perversion of Democracy. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Glasbeek, H.. 2013. “Missing the Targets: Bill C-45 Reforming the Status Quo to Maintain the Status Quo.” Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 11 (2): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, G. C. 2009. “The Responsibilization Strategy of Health and Safety: Neo-liberalism and the Reconfiguration of Individual Responsibility for Risk.” British Journal of Criminology 49: 326–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, F. 2003. “Regulatory Reform in Light of Regulatory Character: Assessing Industrial Safety Change in the Aftermath of the Kader Toy Factory Fire in Bangkok, Thailand.” Social & Legal Studies 12 (4): 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, F., and Sutton, A.. 2003. “The Engineer’s Dilemma: A Sociological Perspective on Juridification and Regulation.” Crime, Law and Social Change 39: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, N. 2011. “Regulators Gone Wild! OHS and Criminal Charges Laid in Christmas Eve Scaffolding Deaths.” Canadian Occupational Safety 8 (6) (December/January).Google Scholar
Kenkel, J. F. 2012. Impaired Driving in Canada, 2012-2013 edition. Markham, ON: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Lau, A. 2011. “Charges Stayed in Mill Death: Sawmill Worker Was Killed in Workplace Accident in 2004.” The Record, August 26.Google Scholar
Linden, R., Mann, R. E., Smart, R. G., Vingilis, E., Solomon, R., Chamberlain, E., Asbridge, M., Rehm, J., Fischer, B., Stoduto, G., Wilk, P., Roerecke, M., Trayling, C. and Wiesenthal, D. L.. 2010. “Research, Policy Development and Progress: Antisocial Behaviour and the Automobile.” Canadian Public Policy 36: 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, M., Mewett, A. W., and Sankoff, P.. 2009. Criminal Law. 4th Edition. Markham, ON: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
McCarthy, S. 2014. “Harper Calls Climate Regulations on Oil and Gas Industry ‘Crazy Economic Policy.’” Globe and Mail, December 9. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/harper-it-would-be-crazy-to-impose-climate-regulations-on-oil-industry/article22014508/ (accessed March 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Michalowski, R. 2009. “Power, Crime and Criminology in the New Imperial Age.” Crime Law and Social Change 51: 303–25.Google Scholar
Miller, P., and Rose, N.. 2008. Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Norrie, A. 2001. Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law, 2nd Edition. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Parliament of Canada. 2005. Government Orders: 38th Parliament, 1st session. http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Hansard&Mee=136&Parl=38&Ses=1&Language=E#T1005 (accessed May 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Parliament of Canada. 2006. House of Commons Speeches for 2nd Reading for Bill C-19. 39th Parliament, 1st session. Government of Canada. http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&billId=2277339&View=4 (accessed May 20, 2014).Google Scholar
Pearce, F., and Tombs, S.. 1990. “Ideology Hegemony and Empiricism: Compliance Theories of Regulation.” British Journal of Criminology 30: 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, F., and Tombs, S.. 1989. Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
Red Tape Reduction Commission. 2012. Recommendations Report: Cutting Red Tape… Freeing Business to Grow. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 3. www.reduceredtape.gc.ca/heard-entendu/rr/rr-eng.pdf (accessed March 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Redshaw, S., and Nicoll, F.. 2010. “Gambling Drivers: Regulating Cultural Technologies, Subjects, Spaces and Practices of Mobility.” Mobilities 5 (3): 409–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiman, J. 2004. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison. 7th Edition. London, UK: Pearson Publishing.Google Scholar
Resnick, S. A., and Wolff, R. D.. 2010. “The Economic Crisis: A Marxian Interpretation.” Rethinking Marxism 22: 170–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Justice P. K. 1997. The Westray Story: A Predictable Path to Disaster. Report of the Westray Mine Public Inquiry. Justice K. Peter Richard, Commissioner. Province of Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
Roach, K. 2000. Criminal Law. 2nd Edition. Toronto: Irwin Law.Google Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., and Valverde, M.. 2006. “Governmentality.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, J. D. 2014. “Textuality and the Social Organization of Denial: Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and the Meanings of US Immigration Policies.” Sociological Forum 29: 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, E. 2006. “Police Applaud Street-Racing Bill.” The Globe and Mail, June 16.Google Scholar
Sandborn, T. 2012. “‘We Have Started Ball Rolling’ on Justice for Work Deaths.” The Tyee, September 28. http://m.thetyee.ca/News/2012/09/28/Work-Deaths-Update (accessed March 3, 2015).Google Scholar
Snider, L. 2015. About Canada: Corporate Crime. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
Snider, L.. 2009. “Accommodating Power: The Common Sense of Regulators. Social & Legal Studies 18 (2): 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. Impaired Driving in Canada, 2011. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/130110/dq130110b-eng.htm (accessed September 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Statutes of Canada. 2007–2008. An Act to Amend the Criminal Code and to Make Consequential Amendments to Other Acts, Chapter 6, 2nd Session, 39th Parliament, 56–57 Elizabeth II.Google Scholar
Stribopoulos, J. 2007. “Criminal Justice Law Reform: Stealing a Page From the American Playbook.” Canadian Civil Liberties Association. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871144 (accessed 10 August, 2014).Google Scholar
Tombs, S. Regulating Health and Safety. 1998. Occasional Paper, Wolverhampton Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Tombs, S., and Whyte, D. 2007. Safety Crimes. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Tombs, S., and Whyte, D.. 2013. “The Myths and Realities of Deterrence in Workplace Safety Regulation.” British Journal of Criminology 53 (5): 746–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transport Canada. 2014. Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics 2012. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport. Ottawa: Canada.Google Scholar
Tucker, E. 2012. Old Lessons for New Governance: Safety or Profit and the New Conventional Wisdom. Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 38.Google Scholar
Valiquet, D. 2006. Bill C-19: An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Street Racing) and to Make Consequential Amendment to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act. Legislative Summary: LS-531E. Ottawa, Canada: Parliamentary Information and Research Services.Google Scholar
Vingilis, E., and Smart, R. G.. 2009. “Street Racing: A Neglected Area.” Traffic Injury Prevention 10 (2): 148–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warning, J., Edwards, C., and Todd, S. D.. 2012. “After Metron: The Corporate Criminal Liability Landscape in Canada.” Mondaq Canada. http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/192660/Health+Safety/After+Metron+The+Corporate+Criminal+Liability+Landscape+in+Canada (accessed September 10, 2014.Google Scholar
Whyte, D. 2006. “Regulating Safety, Regulating Profit: Cost-Cutting, Injury and Death in the British North Sea after Piper Alpha,” in Working Disasters: The Politics of Recognition and Response, edited by Tucker, E.. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Whyte, D.. 2009. Naked Labour: Putting Agamben to Work. The Australian Feminist Law Journal 31: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. C. 2010. “Rethinking Canadian Homicide Law, Beatty, J. F. and the Law of Manslaughter.” Alberta Law Review 47: 651–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workers’ Health and Safety Centre. “Worker Death Leads to the Second C-45 Conviction.” http://www.whsc.on.ca/whatnews2.cfm?autoid=663 (accessed May 20, 2011).Google Scholar