No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An Exemplar Dynamic Approach to Language Shift
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Extract
This squib presents an exploration of how Exemplar Dynamics (Hintzman 1986; Goldinger 1996; Pierrehumbert 2001) can be used to model the increased phonetic variability observed in language shift situations. It is based on a study of laryngealized resonants, as pronounced by three fluent speakers of St’át’imcets, a Northern Interior Salish language of British Columbia.
- Type
- Squibs/Notules
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 53 , Issue 2-3 , November 2008 , pp. 387 - 398
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2008
References
Bird, Sonya, and Caldecott, Marion. 2004 Timing differences in
St’át’imcets glottalized resonants: Linguistic or
bio-mechanical? In Proceedings of the tenth Australian international
conference on speech science and technology,
328–333.Google Scholar
Bird, Sonya, Caldecott, Marion, Campbell, Fiona, Gick, Bryan, and Shaw, Patricia A.. 2008. Oral-laryngeal timing in globalised
resonants. Journal of Phonetics
36:492–507.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual
Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry
32:45–86.Google Scholar
Carlson, Barry F., Esling, John H., and Harris, Jimmy G.. 2004. A laryngoscopic phonetic study of Nlaka’pamux
(Thompson) Salish glottal stop, glottalized resonants, and pharyngeals.
University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17:
Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade,
ed. Gerdts, Donna B. and Matthewson, Lisa, 58–71.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C.
1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic
dialect. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania
Press.Google Scholar
Esling, John H., Fraser, Katherine E., and Harris, Jimmy G.. 2005. Glottal stop, glottalized resonants,
and pharyngeals: A reinterpretation with evidence from a laryngoscopic study
of Nuuchahnulth (Nootka). Journal of
Phonetics
33:383–410.Google Scholar
Gerten, Chip, and Baker, Kirk. 2005. The production and perception of
laryngealized vowels in Coatzospan Mixtee. Journal
of Phonetics
33:311–334.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D.
1996. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken
word identification and recognition memory. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
22:1166–1183.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D.
2007. A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic
speech perception. In Proceedings of 16th International Congress of
Phonetic Sciences, 49–54. www.icphs2007.de (accessed
November 2008).Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, and Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic
overview. Journal of Phonetics,
29:383–406.Google Scholar
Hintzman, Douglas L.
1986. “Schema abstraction” in a
multiple-trace memory model. Psychological
Review
93:411–428.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B.
1976. Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the
source of morphophono-logical change. In Current
progress in historical linguistics: Proceedings of the second international
conference on historical linguistics, ed. Christie, William M. Jr., 95–105. Amsterdam:
North-Holland.Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie K.
2005. Segmental and prosodie effects on coda
glottalisation. Journal of Phonetics
33:335–362.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker
normalization. In Talker variability in speech
processing, ed. Johnson, Keith and Mullennix, John, 145–165. San
Diego: Academic
Press.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1967. Uvular-pharyngeal resonants in
Interior Salish. International Journal of American
Linguistics
33:228–234.Google Scholar
Namdaran, Nahal. 2006. Retraction in
St’át’imcets: An ultrasonic investigation. MA
thesis, University of British
Columbia.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
1995. Prosodie effects on glottal
allophones. In Vocal fold physiology: Voice quality
control — Proceedings of the VIIIth Voice Fold Physiology
Conference, ed. Fujimura, Osamu and Hirano, Minoru, 39–60. San Diego:
Singular Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition
and contrast. In Frequency and the emergence of
linguistic structure, ed. Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul, 137–157.
Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2002. Word-specific phonetics. In
Laboratory phonology
1, ed. Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha, 101–139. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2003. Exemplar Theory. Paper read at the 77th
meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,
Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Frisch, Stefan. 1996. Synthesizing allophonic
glottalization. In Progress in speech
synthesis, ed. van Santen, Jan, Sproat, Richard W., Olive, Joseph P., and Hirschberg, Julia, 9–26. New York:
Springer.Google Scholar
Shahin, Kimary. 2004. Whence St’át’imcets
pharyngeals. Paper read at the 39th International Conference on
Salish and Neighbouring Languages, Squamish,
BC.Google Scholar
Shank, Scott, and Wilson, Ian. 2000. Acoustic evidence for ʔ as a glottalized
pharyngeal glide in Nuu-chah-nulth. University of British Columbia
Working Papers in Linguistics 3: Proceedings of the 35th
International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed.
Gessner, Suzanne and Oh, Sunyoung, 185–197.Google Scholar
van Eijk, Jan. 1987. A dictionary of the Lillooet
language. Ms., University of
Victoria,
BC.Google Scholar
van Eijk, Jan. 1997. The Lillooet language: Phonology,
morphology, syntax. Vancouver:
UBC Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha. 1996. Acoustic characteristics of ejectives in Ingush. In
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken
Language Processing, ed. Bunnell, H.T. and Idsardi, W., 1525–1528. www.asel.udel.edu/icslp/cdrom/vol.3/273/a273.pdf (accessed November
2008).Google Scholar
Wright, Richard, Hargus, Sharon, and Davis, Katharine. 2002. On the categorization of ejectives:
Data from Witsuwit’en. Journal of the
International Phonetic Association
32:43–77.Google Scholar