Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:58:20.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1995. Pp. viii + 326 US$22.95 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Anne Furlong*
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blakemore, Diane. 1989. Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but. Linguistics and Philosophy 12:1538.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blass, Regina. 1990. Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooley, Ralph. 1983. Codes and contexts: An argument for their description. In Intercultural Communication Theory: Current perspectives, ed. Gudykunst, William, 241251. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Davis, Steven. 1991. Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1983. Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, ed. Eco, Umberto and Sebeok, Thomas, 198220. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and relevance — Communication and context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1982. The speech communication model in 20th-century linguistics and its sources. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguistics, August 29-September 4, 1982, Tokyo, ed. Hattori, Shiro, Inoue, Kazuko, Simomiya, Tadao, and Nagashima, Yoshio, 864869. Tokyo: Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kess, Joseph. 1993. Review of Steven Davis, Pragmatics: A reader. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38:454456.Google Scholar
Mura, Susan. 1983. Licensing violations: Legitimate violations of Grice’s conversational principle. In Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy, ed. Graig, Robert and Tracey, Karen, 101115. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4:295329.Google Scholar
Romney, Claude. 1993. Review of Ernst-August Gutt, Translation and relevance — Communication and context. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38:110113.Google Scholar
Rundquist, Suellen. 1990. Indirectness in conversation: Flouting Grice’s maxims at dinner. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16-19, 1990: General Session and Parasession on the Legacy of Grice, ed. Hall, Kira, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Meachem, Michael, Reinman, Sondra, and Sutton, Laurel, 509518. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Conversation and Discourse, ed. Werth, Paul, 155178. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1987. Précis of Relevance (plus open peer commentary and authors’ response). The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:697754.Google Scholar