Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:38:15.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degrees of Transparency in Word Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

New words can be formed by adding suffixes to other words. Derived words formed in this way may be phonologically transparent with respect to their base word, or they may be opaque; monstrous is preserved in monstrous#ness but not in monstro+sity. The juncture between suffix and stem is either a word boundary (#) or a formative boundary (+), and while word boundary derivations are always transparent, formative boundary derivations usually result in stress shifting to a syllable other than the syllable which is stressed in the base word, vowel quality changing, etc.

Type
Remarks/Remarques
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 1981 , pp. 73 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronoff, M. and Anshen, F. (1981) ‘Morphological productivity and phonological transparency.’ CJL/RCL 26:63–72.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. and Schvaneveldt, R. (1978) ‘Testing morphological productivity.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 318.106–114.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1980) ‘Productivity in word formation.’ Papers from the Sixteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (in press) ‘Speech understanding as a psychological process.’ In Simon, J. C., ed., Spoken Language Generation and Understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Murrell, G. A.and Morton, J. (1974) ‘Word recognition and morphemic structure.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102.963–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G.and Jarvella, R. J. (1972) ‘Some linguistic determinants of word classification times.’ Psychonomic Science, 27.220–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P. and Hall, R. (1979) ‘Memory representation for morphologically related words.’ Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18.399–412.Google Scholar