Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:31:21.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Droste Flip G. , and Joseph John E. , eds. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description. In the series Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1991. Pp. vii + 355. Hfl. 190,-; US$110.00 (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Edith A. Moravcsik*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, Barry J. 1990 Relational Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert 1991 Syntactic Theory: A Unified Approach. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth 1992 A Concise Introduction to Syntactic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, Pullum, Geoffrey, and Sag, Ivan 1985 Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univresity Press. Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane 1991 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey 1987 Generative Grammar. London: Longman. Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo, and Takami, Ken-ichi 1992 Functional Syntax and GB Theory. Ms.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald 1986 An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science 10:140.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, and Uriagereka, Juan 1988 A Course in GB Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich 1983 Integrational Linguistics I. General Outline. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matthews, P.H. 1981 Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor A. 1988 Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1991 Why is Syntax Complicated? Milwaukee Studies in Language 5:3149.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R., eds. 1980 Current Approaches to Syntax. Syntax and Semantics 13. New York: Academic Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J., 1986 Linguistic Theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A. 1987 Fundamentals. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics 1. Stan ford, Cal.: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1991 Autolexical Syntax: A Theory of Parallel Grammatical Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Sanders, Gerald A., 1972 Equational Grammar. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
Sells, Peter 1985 Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories. Stanford, Cal.: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Google Scholar
Shaumyan, Sebastian 1987 A Semiotic Theory of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley 1988 A Case for Lexicase. London: Pinter. Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985 The Case against Plain Vanilla Syntax. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 15:205225.Google Scholar