Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:39:46.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Instruction on Second Language Acquisition of the Japanese Long-Distance Reflexive Zibun

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Lydia White ,
Makiko Hirakawa  and
Takako Kawasaki
Lydia White
Affiliation:
McGill University
Makiko Hirakawa
Affiliation:
McGill University
Takako Kawasaki
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on a small study investigating whether teaching second language learners the long-distance (LD) properties of the Japanese reflexive zibun ‘self leads to acquisition of its subject-oriented status. The study involved low intermediate level learners of Japanese who were instructed on zibun over a four-week period. The focus of the instruction was that the reflexive zibun can take long-distance antecedents. At the same time, subjects were never taught that the antecedent must be a subject. Subjects were tested using a truth-value judgment task. Results show that the learners initially rejected LD binding; they showed a significant increase in acceptance of LD antecedents after the teaching intervention. Analyses of individual learners show that about half of them successfully acquired the relevant properties of zibun. With one exception, learners did not generalize from their instruction to assume that “anything goes” as far as antecedents for zibun are concerned. Rather, they acquired grammars of reflexive binding that fall within the range permitted by Universal Grammar.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article cherche à déterminer si, en apprentissage d’une langue seconde, l’enseignement des propriétés de liage à longue distance du pronom réfléchi japonais zibun ‘soi-même’ conduit à l’acquisition de son statut de pronom orienté vers le sujet. L’étude rapportée ici implique des apprenants du japonais langue seconde de niveau intermédiaire inférieur ayant reçu un enseignement sur zibun pendant quatre semaines. Cet enseignement portait sur la possibilité d’avoir des antécédents à longue distance. Les participants n’ont jamais appris que l’antécédent doit être un sujet. Les résultats d’un test de jugements de vérité montrent que les apprenants commencent par rejeter le liage à longue distance; après la période d’enseignement, le taux d’acceptation de ce type de liage augmente de manière significative. L’analyse des résultats individuels montre que la moitié des participants ont réussi à acquérir les propriétés pertinentes de zibun. À une exception près, les apprenants se sont gardés de généraliser à partir de l’enseignement reçu et donc de considérer que zibun peut prendre n’importe quel type d’antécédent. Ils ont plutôt acquis des grammaires sur le liage des réfléchis qui appartiennent à la gamme permise par la Grammaire Universelle.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 235 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikawa, Takako. 1993. Reflexivity in Japanese and LF analysis of zibun binding. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan. 1994. Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research 10: 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn-Garavito, Joyce. 1995. L2 acquisition of verb complementation and Binding Principle B. In Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, ed. Eckman, Fred, Highland, Diane, Lee, Peter, Mileman, Jean, and Rutkowski, Rita, 79–99. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Christie, Katrien, and Lantolf, James P.. In press. Bind me up bind me down: A UG study of reflexives in the second language. In Generative approaches to second language acquisition, ed. Flynn, Suzanne, Martohardjono, Gita, and O’Neil, Wayne. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Sung, Li-May. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 1–22.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, and McKee, Cecile. 1986. Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 16, ed. Berman, Stephen, Choe, Jae-Woong, and McDonough, Joyce, 94–110. GLSA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Doughty, Catherine. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, Fred. 1994. Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition. In Research methodology in second-language acquisition, ed. Tarone, Elaine, Gass, Susan, and Cohen, Andrew, 207–225. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred, Bell, Lawrence, and Nelson, Dianne. 1988. On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel, and Broselow, Ellen. 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In Proceedings of NELS 16, ed. Berman, Stephen, Choe, Jae-Woong, and McDonough, Joyce, 154–168. GLSA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan. 1982. From theory to practice. In On TESOL, ed. Hines, Mary and Rutherford, William, 129–139. Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, Makiko. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research 6: 60–85.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina, and Sigurjonsdottir, Sigridur. 1990. The development of “long-distance anaphora”: A cross-linguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, Fusa. 1991. The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 287–313.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, Usha, and Teranishi, Keiko. 1994. Preferences versus grammaticality judgments: Some methodological issues concerning the Governing Category Parameter in second language acquisition. In Research methodology in second-language acquisition, ed. Tarone, Elaine, Gass, Susan, and Cohen, Andrew, 185–206. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1989. The child’s trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 321–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, Pierre. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In Proceedings of NELS 17, ed. McDonough, Joyce and Plunkett, Bernadette, 483–500. GLSA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Progovac, Liliana. 1993. Long-distance reflexives: Movement-to-Infl vs. relativized subject. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 755–772.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.Google Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. 1989. The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. 1991. Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language 67: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. 1993. Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. 1995. Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research 11: 206–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, Martha. 1996. Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long-term effects. Second Language Research 12: 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, Martha, and White, Lydia. 1993. Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Shigenori. 1996. The nature of interlanguage: SLA of reflexives. Second Language Research 12: 266–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Manzini, Rita. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Parameter setting, ed. Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin, 41–76. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 1991a. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7: 133–161.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 1991b. The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1: 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 1995. Input, triggers and second language acquisition: Can binding be taught? In Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, ed. Eckman, Fred, Highland, Diane, Lee, Peter, Mileman, Jean, and Rutkowski, Rita, 63–78. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
White, Lydia, Bruhn-Garavito, Joyce, Kawasaki, Takako, Pater, Joe, and Prévost, Philippe. 1997. The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning 47: 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar