Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:26:50.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ill-Formedness in the Dictionary: A Source of Constraint Violation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Carole Paradis
Carole Paradis*
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is increasingly accepted in generative phonology that phonological alternations can be caused, directly or indirectly, by phonological constraints. The Theory of Constraints and Repair Strategies (TCRS) proposed by Paradis (1988a, 1988b, 1990, 1992, 1993) claims that when a constraint is violated, a repair strategy must apply which, in repairing the violation, produces a phonological alternation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 38 , special_issue 2: Special Issue: Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology , June 1993 , pp. 215 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen 1976. On the Description of Consonant Gradation in Fula. Studies in African Linguistics. 7:93–136.Google Scholar
Arnott, D.W. 1970. On the Nominal and Verbal Systems of Fula. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce 1991. Syllable Structure in Bella Coola. Linguistic Inquiry. 22:598–646.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1989. A Unified Set of Features for Consonants and Vowels. Ms.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1993. Place of Articulation in Consonants and Vowels: A Unified Theory. In L’architecture et la géométrie des représentations phonologiques. Laks, Bernard and Rialland, Annie, eds. Paris: CNRS. [In press.]Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart 1991. Coronals and the Phonotactics of Non-Adjacent Consonants in English. Pp. 49–60 in The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. Phonetics and Phonology Series 2. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry 1988. The Phonology of Final Glottal Stops. Pp. 113–130 in Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics. Emonds, Joseph, Mistry, P.J., Samiian, Vida, Thornburg, Linda, eds. Fresno, California: California State University/Fresno.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko 1988. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1982. How Abstract is Phonology? Pp. 81–118 in Explanation in Phonology. De Haan, Ger J. and Zonneveld, Wim, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, and Evers, Vincent 1991. On the Universality of Coronal Articulator. Pp. 79–100 in The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. Phonetics and Phonology Series 2. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1983a. Description phonologique du guéré. Abidjan: Presses de l’Université d’Abidjan.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1983b. La règle d’élision syllabique et les séquences vocaliques en guéré. Pp. 181–195 in Current Approaches to African Linguistics. Kaye, Jonathan, ed. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1987. Glide Alternations in Pulaar (Fula) and the Theory of Charm and Government. Pp. 311–327 in Current Approaches to African Linguistics. Odden, David, ed. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988a. On Constraints and Repair Strategies. The Linguistic Review. 6:71–97.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988b. Towards a Theory of Constraint Violations. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 5:1–43.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1990. Focus in Gere Configurational Constraints. Pp. 53–63 in Current Approaches to African Linguistics. Hutchison, John and Manfredi, Victor, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1992. Lexical Phonology and Morphology: The Nominal Classes in Fula. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1993. Le dictionnaire comme source de malformations phonologiques. In Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Linguists. Crochetière, Andié, Boulanger, Jean-Claude et Ouellon, Conrad, eds. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval. [In press.]Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and El Fenne, Fatim 1992. L’alternance C/Ø des verbes français: une analyse par contraintes et stratégies de réparation. Revue québécoise de linguistique. 21:107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and El Fenne, Fatim 1993. French Verbal Inflection Revisited: Constraints, Repairs and Floating Consonants. In New Trends in French Phonology and Phonetics. Durand, Jacques, Hintze, Marie-Anne and Battye, Adriane, eds. Lingua. [In press.]Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, Lebel, Caroline, and LaCharité, Darlene 1993. Adaptation d’emprunts: les conditions de la préservation segmentale. Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Dyck, Carrie, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto. [To appear].Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Nikiema, Emmanuel 1993. Historique de la notion de “contrainte” en phonologie générative. Langues et linguistique. 19:43–70.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François 1989. On Coronal Transparency. Phonology. 6:317–349.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François 1990. On Explaining Some OCP Violations. Linguistic Inquiry. 20:456–466.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François 1992. The Coronal vs Velar Placelessness Controversy. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 6:192–229.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1993. Optimality Theory. Ms.Google Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François 1987. Liaison and Nasalization in French. Pp. 225–235 in Studies in Romance Languages. Neidle, Carol and Cedeño, Rafael Nuñez, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François 1990. The Origin and Interpretation of French Loans in Carrier. International Journal of American Linguistics. 56:484–502.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin 1989. Articulator Based Distinctive Features for Vowels and Consonants: The Role of Dorsal and Radical. Ms.Google Scholar
Roy, Marie-Josée 1991. La minimalité dans l’adaptation phonologique d’emprunts. Pp. 271–283 in Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Wilson, Tom, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Roy, Marie-Josée 1992. Le rôle des contraintes phonologiques dans l’adaptation d’emprunts anglais en français québécois. MA thesis, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth 1986. The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-Linear Phonology. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Trigo, Loren 1988. On the Phonological Derivation and Behavior of Nasal Glides. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Charles 1991. Underlying OCP Violations in Lama. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics IV. Hunt, Katharine, Perry, Thomas A. and Samiian, Vida, eds. Fresno, California: University of California/Fresno.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira 1988. The Obligatory Contour Principle and Phonological Rules: A Loss of Identity. Linguistic Inquiry. 19:65–101.Google Scholar