Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:11:17.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Eithne Guilfoyle*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awbery, G.M. 1976. The syntax of Welsh: A transformational view of the passive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Carnie, Andrew. 1996. A minimalist approach to some problems of Irish word order. In The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, ed. Borsley, Robert D. and Roberts, Ian, 223240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., and Roberts, Ian, eds. 1996. The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christian, Brothers (The). 1980. New Irish grammar Dublin: Fallons.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, and McCloskey, James. 1987. Government, barriers, and small clauses in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18:173238.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 1995. Particles and projections in Irish syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1980. Word order in generative grammar. Journal of Linguistic Research 1:3354.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne. 1987. Parameters and functional projection. In Proceedings of NELS 18, ed. Blevins, Jamesand Carter, Juli, 193207. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne. 1990. Functional projection and phrase structure parameters. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Randall, ed. 1990. Syntax and semantics 23: The syntax of the modern Celtic languages. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D., and Thomas, A.R.. 1977. The Welsh language: Studies in its syntax and semantics. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1979. Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1983. A VP in a VSO language. In Order, concord, and constituency, ed. Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 955. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding, and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax and semantics 23: The syntax of the modern Celtic languages, ed. Hendrick, Randall, 199248. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, and Reinhart, Tanya. To appear. The syntax and interpretation of scrambling in Dutch. In Argument projection: Lexical and compositional factors, ed. Butt, Miriam and Geuder, Willi. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire. 1992. Case and syntactic geometry. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian, and Roussou, Anna. 1997. Interface interpretation. Paper read at the 20th GLOW Colloquium, Rabat.Google Scholar
Schafer, Robin. 1995. Negation and verb second in Breton. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13:135172.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1984. Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Stenson, Nancy. 1981. Studies in Irish syntax. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1989. Further remarks on Breton agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7:429471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar