Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:28:22.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La diphtongaison romane, by Palle Spore (Études romanes de l’Université d’Odense, 3). Odense: Odense University Press, 1972. Pp. 378.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Frede Jensen
Frede Jensen*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Fall 1975 , pp. 197 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dory, Albert 1935 Contribution a l’étude de la voyelle accentuée. RLaR 67.373–445 (1933-37).Google Scholar
Juret, A. 1922 Essai d’explication de la transformation des voyelles latines accentuées e, o, a en roman ie, uo, é . BSL 23.138–55.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich 1963 Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. I: Einleitung und Vokalismus. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1963 2. [Sammlung Göschen, 128/128a].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Emil 1894 Provenzalisches Supplement-Wörterbuch. Berichtigungen und Ergänzungen zu Raynouards Lexique Roman. Leipzig: Reisland, 1894-1924.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. 1916 Die Diphthonge im Provenzalischen. Sitzungsberichte der königlichen preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1.342–70.Google Scholar
Salverda De Grave, J.-J. 1918 La diphtongaison des voyelles libres accentuées en français. Neophilologus 3.161–7.Google Scholar