Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:51:02.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The measurement of interference in old texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marcel Danesi
Marcel Danesi*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Bott (1970: 217-19) points out, one of the most successful applications of computer to language research has been in the production of concordances—alphabetical lists of all the words in a written corpus followed by a reference system (i.e., page and line number) and a context (i.e., the line in which the word occurs). This valuable tool has greatly facilitated the description of the language of old texts.

The literature on the synchronic problems related to languages in contact is abundant. However, the effects of borrowing on the formation of a language have not been studied in any detail mainly because (in our opinion) of the lack of appropriate analytical tools. Clearly, the diagnosis and examination of interference mechanisms in old texts is important not only for a complete historical description of a language at a particular stage in its development, but also as a means of understanding the nature of contact phenomena. With the advent of computer concordances this lacuna may soon be filled.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , Spring 1977 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkin, Herbert, & Colton, Raymond R. 1970 Statistical methods. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1970 5.Google Scholar
Babilas, Wolfgang 1968 Untersuchungen zu den Sermoni subalpini. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Battisti, C. & Alessio, G. 1948 Dizionario etimologico italiano. Firenze: Barbera, 1948-57.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano 1974 Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Bott, M. F. 1970 Computational linguistics. In Lyons, 1970:215–28.Google Scholar
Bourciez, Édouard 1967 Élément de linguistique romane. Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1967 5.Google Scholar
Brero, Camillo 1969 Gramàtica piemontèisa. Torino: Musicalbrandè, 1969 2.Google Scholar
Clivio, Amedeo, & Clivio, Gianrenzo P. 1971 Bibliografia ragionata della lingua regionale e dei dialetti del Piemonte e della Valle d’Aosta, e della letteratura in piemontese. Torino: Centro Studi Piemontesi.Google Scholar
Clivio, Gianrenzo P. 1970 The volgare in Piedmont from the Middle Ages to the end of the sixteenth century. Romanische Forschungen 82.65–93.Google Scholar
Clivio, Gianrenzo P. 1972 Language contact in Piedmont: aspects of Italian interference in the sound system of Piedmontese. In Firchow, Grimstad, Hasselmo & O’Neil, 1972:119–31.Google Scholar
Clivio, Gianrenzo P., & Danesi, Marcel 1974 Concordanza linguistica dei “Sermoni Subalpini”. Torino: Centro Studi Piemontesi.Google Scholar
Cremonesi, Carla 1962 Nozioni di grammatica storica provenzale. Milano: Istituto Editoriale Cisalpino.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel 1974 The language of the Sermoni Subalpini. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Di Sant’Albino, Vittorio 1964 Gran dizionario piemontese-italiano. Torino: Bottega d’Erasmo, [1859].Google Scholar
Firchow, E. S., Grimstad, K., Hasselmo, N., & O’Neil, W. (eds.) 1972 Studies for Einar Haugen. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) 1968 Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Foerster, Wendelin 1879 Galloitalische Predigten. Romanische Studien 4.1–92.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, J., & Edmont, E. 1902 Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: H. Champion, 1902-10.Google Scholar
Glickman, Robert J., & Staalman, Gerrit J. 1966 Manual for the printing of literary texts and concordances by computer. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar 1950 The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Lg 26.210–31.Google Scholar
Jaberg, Karl, & Jud, Jakob 1928 Sprach-und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. Zofingen: Ringier, 1928-40.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M., & Gould, L. 1964 Concordances from computers. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Mechano-linguistics Project]Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich 1965 Lingüística románica: fonética. Madrid: Credos.Google Scholar
Lazzeri, Gerolamo 1942 Antologia dei primi secoli della letteratura italiana. Milano: U. Hoepli.Google Scholar
Lyons, John (ed.) 1970 New horizons in linguistics. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackey, W. F. 1968 The description of bilingualism. In Fishman, 1968:554–74.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm 1935 Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Moignet, G. 1973 Grammaire de l’ancien français: morphologie, syntaxe. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard 1966 Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: fonetica. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard 1968 Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ugolini, Francesco A. 1942 Testi antichi italiana. Torino: Chiantore.Google Scholar
Walker, H. M., & J., Lev 1953 Statistical inference. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wartburg, Walther Von 1928 Französisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bonn: Bâle, 1928-50.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel 1967 Languages in contact: findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar