We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Robert R. Ratcliffe. The ‘Broken’ Plural Problem in Arabic and Comparative Semitic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1998. Pp. xi + 261. US$89.00 (hardcover).
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
27 June 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Hinds, Martin, and Badawi, El-Said. 1986. A dictionary of Egyptian Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.1991. Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François, Beland, Renée, and Idrissi, Ali. To appear. The mental representation of Semitic words.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.1992. The broken plural problem in Arabic, Semitic and Afroasiatic: A solution based on the diachronic application of prosodie analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.1996. Drift and noun plural reduplication in Afroasiatic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies59:296–311.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.1998. Defining morphological isoglosses: The ‘broken’ plural and Semitic subclassification. Journal of Near Eastern Studies57:81–123.Google Scholar
Wehr, Hans. 1974. A dictionary of modern written Arabic, ed. by Cowan, J Milton. Ithaca, NY: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar