Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:57:10.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second Language Phonology as Redeployment of LI Phonological Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

John Archibald
John Archibald*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents research showing that second language (L2) learners do not have deficient representations and they are capable of acquiring structures that are absent from their first language (L1). The Redeployment Hypothesis—which claims that L2 phonologies include novel representations created via redeployment of L1 phonological components—is consistent with data from several domains, including acquisition of phonological features, syllable structure, moraic structure, and metrical structure. Moreover, it is shown that input prominence plays a role in L2 acquisition, and that language learners are sensitive to robust phonetic cues. Finally, studies done on interlingual homographs and homophones argue for non-selective access to the bilingual lexicon, suggesting that the language processing capacity is always engaged.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article présente les résultats de recherches qui démontrent que les apprenants d’une deuxième langue (L2) n’ont pas des représentations déficientes et qu’ils peuvent acquérir des structures qui sont absentes dans leur première langue (Ll). L’hypothèse de redéploiement—qui veut que les phonologies L2 incluent des représentations nouvelles créées via le redéploiement des composants phonologiques de Ll—va de pair avec les données de plusieurs domaines, entre autres l’acquisition des traits phonologiques, de la structure syllabique, de la structure moraique et de la structure métrique. De plus, il est démontré que la saillance de l’input joue un rôle dans l’acquisition de L2, et que les apprenants de langues sont sensibles aux indices phonétiques robustes. Finalement, les études portant sur les homographes et homophones entre deux langues indiquent que l’accès au lexique bilingue est non-sélectif, suggérant que la capacité pour le traitement du langage est toujours engagé.

Type
Part III: Language and the Theory of Mind
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 50 , Issue 1-4: Language know-how: Canadian Perspectives in Contemporary Linguistics/Le savoir-faire langagier: perspectives canadiennes en linguistique contemporaine , December 2005 , pp. 285 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, John. 1993. Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, John. 1997. The acquisition of English stress by speakers of non-accentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics 35:167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, John, ed. 2000a. Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Archibald, John. 2000b. Models of L2 phonological acquisition. In Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition: Selected proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum, ed. Swierzbin, Bonnie, Morris, Frank, Anderson, Michael E., Klee, Carol A., and Tarone, Elaine, 125–157. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Archibald, John. 2003. Learning how to parse second language consonant clusters. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48:149–178.Google Scholar
Atkey, Susan. 2001. The acquisition of L2 segmental contrasts: English speakers’ perception and production of Czech palatal stops. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Piepenbrock, Richard, and van Rijn, H.. 1993. The CELEX Lexical Database [CD-ROM]. Release 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, Theo, Mennen, Susan, and van der Slik, Frans. 2000. Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica 54:298–308.Google Scholar
Brown, Cynthia. 2000. The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. Archibald, John, 4–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L.M. 2001. Mergers, chain shifts and dissimilatory processes: Palatals and rhotics in Argentine Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Avital, Frost, Ram, Pollatsek, Alexander, and Rayner, Keith. 2005. Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes 20:341–371.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, Ton, Grainger, Jonathan, and van Heuven, Walter J.B.. 1999. Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language 41:496–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, Ton, Van Jaarsveld, Henk, and Brinke, Sjoerd Ten. 1998. Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects on task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1:51–66.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A., and Barlow, Jessica A.. 1998. On the characterization of a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 25:61–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drieghe, Denis, Brysbaert, Marc, Desmet, Timothy, and de Baecke, Constantijn. 2004. Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16:79–103.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred R., Elreyes, Abdullah, and Iverson, Gregory K.. 2003. Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research 19:169–208.Google Scholar
Eckman, Fred R., and Iverson, Gregory K.. 1993. Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Second Language Research 9:234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, Fred R., and Iverson, Gregory K.. 1994. Pronunciation difficulties in ESL: Coda consonants in English interlanguage. In First and second language phonology, ed. Yavas, Mehmet, 251–265. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory and findings and problems. In Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-linguistic research, ed. Winifred Strange, 233–277. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Gerard, Linda D., and Scarborough, Don L.. 1989. Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15:305–313.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Poot, Antonio. In preparation. The acquisition of Yucatec Maya ejectives by native Spanish speakers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, and Jacobs, Arthur M.. 1996. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 103:518–565.Google Scholar
Han, M. 1992. The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for nonnative speakers. Phonetica 49:102–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253–306.Google Scholar
Howe, Darin and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2004. Harmonic scales as faithfulness. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 49:1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesney, Karen. 2005. Chain shift in phonological acquisition. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Kambe, Gretchen, Rayner, Keith, and Duffy, Susan. 2001. Global context effects of processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Memory & Cognition 29:363–372.Google Scholar
Kawagoe, Itsue. 2003. Acquisition of English word stress by Japanese learners. In Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Sprouse, Rex A., and Liljestrand, Audrey, 161–167. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1996. Synchronie chain shifts in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 27:341–351.Google Scholar
Kliegl, Reinhold, Grabner, Ellen, Rolfs, Martin, and Engbert, Ralf. 2004. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16:262–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene, and Prévost, Philippe. 1999. The role of the L1 and of teaching in the acquisition of English sounds by francophones. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 23, ed. Greenhill, Annabel, Littlefield, Heather, and Tano, Cheryl, 373–385. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Shin Sook. 2000. Chain shift in second language phonological acquisition. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 4:175–199.Google Scholar
Libben, Gary. 2000. Representation and processing in the second language lexicon: The homogeneity hypothesis. In Second language grammars, ed. Archibald, John A., 228–248. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macken, Marlys A. 1980. The child’s lexical representation: The ‘puzzle-puddle-pickle’evidence. Journal of Linguistics 16:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mah, Jennifer. 2003. The acquisition of phonological features in a second language. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Mah, Jennifer, and Archibald, John. 2003. The acquisition of L2 length contrasts. In Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. Liceras, Juana M., Zobl, Helmut, and Goodluck, Helen, 208–212. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Major, Roy Coleman. 2001. Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, Mineharu, and Archibald, John. 2004. Eye-tracking and interlingual homographs: Evidence for non-selective access to the bilingual lexicon. Paper presented at the Canadian Linguistic Association annual meeting, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Ou, Shu-chen, and Ota, Mitsuhiko. 2004. Metrical computation in L2 stress acquisition: Evidence from Chinese-English interlanguage. Paper presented at Laboratory Phonology 9, Indiana.Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith, and Juhasz, Barbara. 2004. Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16: 340–352.Google Scholar
Schumann, John H. 1986. Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 7:379–392.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V. 1973. The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanderweide, Teresa. 2005. Cue-based learning and the acquisition of pre-vocalic clusters. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2001. Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In The role of speech perception in phonology, ed. Hume, Elizabeth and Johnson, Keith, 252–277. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2004. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In The phonetic bases ofmarkedness, ed. Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert, and Steriade, Donca, 34–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, Martha and Archibald, John. 2000. Second language syllables. In Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. Archibald, John, 64–101. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1995. Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology 12:85–130.Google Scholar