Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T12:59:50.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural and Linguistic Factors in Word Formation: An Integrated Approach to the Development of the Suffix -AGE, by Suzanne Fleischman (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 86). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977. Pp. xviii, 476.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Noel Corbett
Noel Corbett*
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 23 , Issue 1-2 , Spring/Fall 1978 , pp. 144 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corbett, Noel 1973 Review of Hope 1971. MPh 71.66–9.Google Scholar
Corbett, Noel 1978-9 Review of Scoones 1976. RPh 32.135–7.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne 1974-5 Review of Hope 1971. RPh 28.637–46.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne 1976-7 The Suffix -age in Modern French: Language Change Viewed in a Historico-Cultural Perspective. RPh 30.42–58.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne To appear. Factores operantes en la historia de un sufijo: el caso de -azgo [Miscellany of Studies Dedicated to E. Marcos Llorach by the Facultad de Letras, Universidad de Oviedo].Google Scholar
Hollyman, J. K. 1957 Le Développement du vocabulaire féodal en France pendant le haut moyen âge. Paris et Genève. [Société de Publications romanes et françaises, 58].Google Scholar
Hope, T. E. 1965 The Process of Neologism Reconsidered with Reference to Lexical Borrowing in Romance. TPS 46–84.Google Scholar
Hope, T. E. 1971 Lexical Borrowing in the Romance Languages: A Critical Study of Italianisms in French and of Gallicisms in Italian from 1100 to 1900. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov 1945 Development of the Latin Suffixes -ANTIA and -ENTIA in the Romance Languages, with Special Regard to Ibero-Romance. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University Press. [University of California Publications in Linguistics, 1:4].Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov 1966 Genetic Analysis of Word Formation. CTL 3.305–64.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov 1972 The Pan-European Suffix -esco, -esque in Stratigraphic Projection. Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, 357–87. Edited by Valdman, Albert. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Matore, G. 1952 Le Néologisme: naissance et diffusion. FM 20.87–92.Google Scholar
Matore, G. 1953 La Méthode en lexicologie: domaine français. Paris.Google Scholar
Scoones, S. 1976 Les noms de quelques officiers féodaux: Des origines ă la fin du XIIeme siècle. Paris: Klincksieck. [Bibliothèque française et romane (dir. G. Straka). Série A: Manuels et études linguistiques, 37].Google Scholar