Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:35:18.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultural Attitudes in Discourse Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Bernhard D. Harder*
Affiliation:
University of Windsor

Extract

Complex communication difficulties involving stylistics, logic and clarity in the discourse structures of advanced English compositions by writers from another language and culture cannot be explained as merely insufficient knowledge of English grammar, diction or idiom. Such problems do not only involve linguistic differences in the native (NL) and target language (TL) but encompass different stylistic habits, different ways of thinking, and different cultural values. Robert Kaplan has frequently argued that the rhetoric and logic in ESL English compositions vary according to the native language and culture of the writer. In one of his early essays he states:

I have tried to demonstrate on the basis of the Arabic language and on the basis of my single example, that rhetoric, the method of organising syntactic units into larger patterns, is as much a culturally coded phenomenon as the syntactic units themselves are (Kaplan 1967:15).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkenkotter, Carol 1983 Decisions and Revisions: The Planning Strategies of a Publishing Writer. College Composition and Communication 34: 156172.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael 1981 Culture and Discourse Structure. Journal of Pragmatics 5:6166.Google Scholar
Cooper, Marilyn and Hoffman, Michael 1983 Talking About Protocols. College Composition and Communication 34:284293.Google Scholar
Flower, Linda S. and Hayes, John R. 1977 Problem-solving Strategies and the Writing Process. College English 39:449461.Google Scholar
Gumpen, John J. and Hymes, Dell, eds. 1964 The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist: Special Publication. 66(6): part 2.Google Scholar
Harder, Bernhard D. 1981 Discourse Structures and Grammatical Competence: An Experimental Composition Course in Japan. Language Sciences 3:2750.Google Scholar
Harder, Bernhard D. 1983 Inherent Cultural Values and Discourse Structures in English Essays by Japanese Students. Detcriptive and Applied Linguistics 16:2531.Google Scholar
Harder, Bernhard D. and Kutz-Harder, Helga 1982 Cultural Interface and Teaching English Composition in Japan. The English Teacher’s Magazine 31:1023.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. 1982 Contrastive Rhetoric — Japanese and English. Paper presented at TESOL, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Houghton, Dianne and Hoey, Michael. 1983 Linguistics and Written Discourse: Contrastive Rhetorics. Pp. 222 in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics: 1982. Kaplan, R. et al, eds. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Yuko 1983 Contrastive Analysis of Discourse Structure in the Writing of Three Freshmen. Ms.Google Scholar
Jones, Stan 1982 Attention to Rhetorical Information While Composing in a Second Language. To appear in the Proceedings of the 4th Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum.Google Scholar
Jones, Stan 1983 Problems with Monitor Use in Second Language Composing. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Jones, Stan and Tetroe, Jacqueline 1983 Composing in a Second Language. To appear in Writing in Real Time. Ann Matsuhashi, ed.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. 1966 Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-cultural Education. Language Learning 16:120.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. 1967 Contrastive Rhetoric and the Teaching of Composition. TESOL Quarterly 1:1016.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. 1978 Contrastive Rhetoric: Some Hypotheses. Instituut vor tergepaite Linguistiek: Review of Applied Linguistics 39-40, 6172.Google Scholar
Kunihiro, Masao 1972 U.S.-Japan Communications. Pp. 155172 in Discord in the Pacific: Challenges to the Japanese-American Alliance. Rosovsky, Henry, ed. Washington: Columbia Books.Google Scholar
Kunihiro, Masao 1973 Indigenous Barriers to Communication. The Japan Interpreter 8:96108.Google Scholar
Kunihiro, Masao 1976 Japanese Language and Intercultural Communication. The Japan Interpreter 10:267283.Google Scholar
Miller, R.A. 1982 Japan’s Modern Myth: The Language and Beyond. Tokyo: Weatherhill.Google Scholar
Morrison, J.L. 1972 The Absence of a Rhetorical Tradition in Japanese Culture. Western Speech 36:89102.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Dennis M. 1979 Communication Characteristics of Asian Americans in Urban Settings: The Case of Honolulu Japanese. Pp. 321337 in Handbook of International Communication, Asante, Molefi et al, eds. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Oliver, Robert T. 1962 Culture and Communication: The Problem of Penetrating National and Cultural Boundaries Springfield, Illinois: Chas. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Oliver, Robert T. 1971 Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
O-Young, Lee 1983 The Culture of “wa”. Japan Quarterly 30:5456.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Sheila 1983 Double Vision: Nonverbal Behavior East and West. Unpublished paper. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Nonverbal Behavior, Toronto, May 1983.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel 1976 Culture, Language, and Education. In Bilingual Multicultural Education and the Professional: From Theory to Practice. Trueba, Henry T. and Barnett-Misrahi, Carol, eds. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schinzinger, Robert 1983 Imitation and Originality in Japanese Culture. Japan Quarterly 30:281288.Google Scholar
Stokes, Henry Scot 1983 The Emptiness Principle. Japan Quarterly 30:160162.Google Scholar
Winner, Irene Portis and Umiker-Sebeok, Jean, eds. 1979 Semiotics of Culture. New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zamel, Vivian 1983 The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies. TESOL Quarterly 17:165187.Google Scholar