No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A First Approach to Newfoundland Phonemics*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Extract
The purpose of these remarks is to present a tentative classification of the syllabic phonemes in general use in eastern Newfoundland. In doing so, it will be necessary to justify making such a presentation at this early stage of enquiry, at the same time demonstrating some of the problems involved in the investigation of Newfoundland dialects.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1959 , pp. 25 - 34
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1959
Footnotes
The following is a revised version of the paper read to the CANADIAN LINGUISTIC ASSOCIATION, June 12, 1958, under the title The Phonetics of Newfoundland English.
References
1. Kurath, Hans, “The Origin of the Dialectal Differences in Spoken American English,” Modern Philology, XXV, 4, (May 1928)Google Scholar.
2. Kurath, Hans, et al.. Handbook of the Linguistic Geography of New England, Providence, 1939, p. 124 Google Scholar.
3. Rogers, J. D., A Historical Geography of the British Colonies, Vol. V, Pt. IV, Newfoundland, Oxford, 1911, p. 61 Google Scholar.
4. Pedley, Rev. Charles, The History of Newfoundland, London, 1863, p. 23 Google Scholar.
5. Rogers, C. J., op. cit., p. 120 Google Scholar.
6. Ibid., p. 121.
7. Pedley, , op. cit., p. 13 Google Scholar.
8. Rogers, , op. cit., p. 56 Google Scholar.
9. Ibid., Preface, p. vii.
10. Possible divisions might be centred on the, following areas: (i) Avalon Peninsula, (ii) Burin Peninsula, and south coast west to Burgeo, (iii) south west corner, (iv) Corner Brook and part of central Newfoundland, (v) northern peninsula, (vi) Notre Dame “Bay and Bonavista Bay.
11. Rogers, , op. cit., p. 61 Google Scholar.
12. See, for example, Avis, W. S., “Speech Differences along the Ontario United States Border, 111, Pronunciation,” JCLA., Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 54 Google Scholar.
13. /Iu/, a rising diphthong, is not included, as being a variant of /ju/.
14. Handbook, pp. 123 ff.
15. Jones, Daniel, The Phoneme, its Nature and Use, Cambridge, 1950, p. 10 Google Scholar; and the ‘History and Meaning of the Term “Phoneme”’, Le Maître Phonétique (supplement), July-December, 1857, p. 14.
16. There is a tendency in Newfoundland, especially among children, to diphthongise all vowels which are normally long, and to lengthen vowels which are normally short.
17. i.e. “no member ever occurs in a word in the same phonetic context as any other member.” See Jones, , The History and Meaning of the Term “Phoneme”, p. 14, § 26 and n. 47 Google Scholar.
18. Kurath, , Handbook, p. 128 Google Scholar.
19. See Thomas, C. K., An Introduction to the Phonetics of American English, New York, 1947, pp. 94–95 Google Scholar.
20. Pike, K. L.., Phonetics, Ann Arbor, 1943, p. 143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21. Jones, D., An Outline of English Phonetics, 8th Edn., London, 1956, Appendix D, pp. 356 ftGoogle Scholar
22. Pike, op. cit., loc. cit.
23. Kurath, , Handbook, p. 125 Google Scholar.