We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Ian Roberts. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals . In the series Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. v + 290. US $30.00 (softcover).
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
06 January 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1996. The poly synthesis parameter.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Elfner, Emily, and James, McCloskey. In press. Pronouns and prosody in Irish. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Celtic Studies (Plenary Addresses). Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Bošković, Zeljko and Nunes, Jairo. 2007. The copy theory of movement: A view from PF. In The Copy Theory of movement, ed. Corver, Norbert and Nunes, Jairo, 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Kenstowicz, Michael, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra and McCloskey, James. 1987. Government, barriers and small clauses in modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry18:173–237.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo2005. Deriving Greenberg's universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry36:315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J.2013. Issues in the phonology-syntax interface in African languages. In Selected Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. Orie, Olanike Ola and Sanders, Karen W., 26–38. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2011. The interaction of linearization and prosody: Evidence from pronoun postposing in Irish. In Formal approaches to Celtic linguistics, ed. Carnie, Andrew, 17–40. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry32: 555–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulkern, Ann E.2011. Left right behind: Irish pronoun postposing and information structure. In Formal approaches to Celtic lingiustics, ed. Carnie, Andrew, 179–202. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea and Norvin, Richards. 2005. Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry36:565–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Syntax and Semantics25:37–62.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2009. On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: The syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure. Gengo Kenkyu136:35–73.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The liandbook of phonological theory (2nd ed.), ed. Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur.2004. The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua114:1465–1526.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar