Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:01.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating clitic doubling in Laurentian French: An experimental approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Cassandra Chapman
Cassandra Chapman*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clitic doubling (CD) is a syntactic construction characterized by a clitic in the inflectional domain doubling a Determiner Phrase (DP) in the canonical object position. CD has been argued to occur in several Romance languages including Spanish (Jaeggli 1982, Hurtado 1984, Suñer 1988, Uriagereka 1995, among many others) and Romanian (Dobrovie-Sorin 1990). This phenomenon has also been well documented in Modern Greek (Philippaki-Warburton et al. 2004, Anagnostopoulou 2006, Tsakali 2008). For example, consider the following direct object CD constructions from Modern Greek (la), Romanian (lb), and Spanish (lc). We see that the DP in object position (sister to V) is doubled by a matching clitic in the inflectional domain.

Type
Squibs/Notules
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , July 2014 , pp. 243 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association. 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2006. Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. I, ed. Everaet, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk, 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph. 1981. The formal nature of anaphoric relations. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ashby, William J. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left-and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 75:203–229.Google Scholar
Auger, Julie. 1994. Pronominal clitics in Québec colloquial French: A morphological analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Belloro, Valeria. 2007. Spanish clitic doubling: A study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1997. Le marquage différentiel de l'objet dans les langues d'Europe. In Actance et valence dans les langues d'europe, ed. Feuillet, Jacques, 193–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brugè, Laura and Brugger, Gerhard. 1994. On the accusative ‘a’ in Spanish. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 4:3–44.Google Scholar
Buthke, Carolin, Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu, and Meisenburg, Trudel. 2010. Sujets disloquéis vs. sujets doublés: À la recherche de la frontière prosodique. Paper presented at the Journées PFC (Phonologie du Français Contemporain) Paris (Des normes à la périphéric). Paris.Google Scholar
Carroll, Suzanne. 1982. Redoublement et dislocation en français populaire. In La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: Approches formelle et fonctionnelle., vol. 1, ed. Lefebvre, Claire, 293–357. Gouvernement du Quebec, Office de la langue française. Québec: Éditeur officiel du Québec.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studio Linguistica 53:40–67.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A'-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer. 2010. Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86: 85–132.Google Scholar
De Cat, Cécile. 2005. French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 115: 1195–1219.Google Scholar
De Cat, Cécile. 2007. French dislocation: Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny, and Sleeman, Petra. 2004. Dislocation. In Handbook of French semantics, ed. Corblin, Francis and de Swart, Henriette, 501–528. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. Clitic doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21:351–397.Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny, Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, and Sleeman, Petra. 2002. The prosody of left detached constituents in French. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, ed. Bell, Bernard and Marlien, Isabelle, 347–350. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2001. Interface conditions and the semantics of argument clitics. Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics 53:107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harizanov, Boris. To appear. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Alfredo. 1984. On the properties of LF. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 5:121–149.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1986. Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction in the syntax of pronominal clitics. In Syntax and semantics: The syntax of pronominal clitics, vol.19, ed. Borer, Hagit, 15–42. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah and Fougeron, Cécile. 2000. A phonological model of French intonation. In Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology, ed. Botinis, Antonis, 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Ruth and Nadasdi, Terry. 1996. Sorting out morphosyntactic variation in Acadian French: The importance of the linguistic marketplace. In Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis, ed. Arnold, Jennifer, Blake, Renee, and Davidson, Brad, 113–128. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32:593–634.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 2008. Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking. Probus 20:33–66.Google Scholar
Nadasdi, Terry. 2000. Variation grammaticale et langue minoritaire: le cas des pronoms cli-tiques enfrançais ontarien. Munich: Lincom Europa 20.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29:939–971.Google Scholar
Ossipov, Hèléne. 1990. A GPSG account of doubling and dislocation in french. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene, Varlokosta, Spyridoula, Georgiafentis, Michalis, and Kot-zoglou, George. 2004. Moving from theta-positions: Pronominal clitic doubling in Greek. Lingua 114:963–989.Google Scholar
Rivas, Alberto. 1977. A theory of clitics. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Haegeman, Liliane, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves. 1990. Syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1983. Structural invariance and symmetry in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1990. Movement, agreement and case. In Partitions and atoms of clause structure: Subjects, agreement, case and clitics, ed. Sportiche, Dominique, 88–243. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Strozer, Judith. 1976. Clitics in Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:391–434.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Annie. 2011. Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing the gap”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33:339–372.Google Scholar
Tsakali, Vina. 2008. Double floating quantifiers in Modern Greek and Pontic. In Microvariation in syntactic doubling, ed. Barbiers, Sjef, 189–203. Wagon Lane, Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26:79–123.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The informational component. New York: Garland.Google Scholar