Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:33:12.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Movement Theory of Obligatory Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Yosuke Sato
Yosuke Sato*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Squib/Notule
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 267 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Phase-based account of extraction in Indonesian. Lingua 118:1440–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arka, I Wayan. 2004. Control and argument structure: Explaining control into subject in Indonesian. Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Malay and Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL), 26–27 July, Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan and Landau, Idan. 2009. Icelandic control is not A-movement: The case from case. Linguistic Inquiry 40:113–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. Reply to Culicover and Jackendoff, “Control is not movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34:269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35:431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Hornstein, Norbert. 2006. Control in Icelandic and theories of control. Linguistic Inquiry 37:591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert, and Nunes, Jairo. 2010. Icelandic control really is A-movement: Reply to Bobaljik and Landau, “Icelandic control is not A-movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 41:111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1976. An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistic Inquiry 7:41–87.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter and Hermon, Gabriella. 1998. The typology of Wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax 1:221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella, and Yanti, . 2008. Voices in Malay/Indonesian. Lingua 118: 1500–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2003. The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79:517–556.Google Scholar
Davies, William. 2005. Madurese control. Kata 7:48–63.Google Scholar
Davies, William and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2004. The grammar of raising and control. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William and Dubinsky, Stanley. 2007. New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William and Kurniawan, Eri. 2010. Indonesian complement clause types with special attention to crossed control. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL), April 30-May 2, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2002. The prefixes di- and N- in Malay/Indonesian dialects. In The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, ed. Wouk, Fay and Malcolm, Ross, 241–283. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1992. Reference and control. In Control and grammar, ed. Larson, Richard, Iatridou, Sabine, Lahiri, Uptal, and Higginbotham, James, 79–108. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurniawan, Eri. 2010. Distinguishing raising and control in Sundanese. Paper presented at Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association XVII (AFLA), May 7–9, Stony Brook University, USA.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34:471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:811–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebeaux, David. 1985. Locality and anaphoric binding. Linguistic Review 4:343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomoto, Hiroki. 2008. A unified analysis of funny control. Paper presented at the 12th International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics, 26–27 June, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria and Potsdam, Eric. 2008. The syntax and semantics of wanting in Indonesian. Lingua 118:1617-1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saddy, Douglas. 1991. WH-scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15: More papers on wh-movement, ed. Cheng, Lisa and Demirdash, Hamida, 183–218. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Minimalist interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto. 1992. PRO in finite clauses: A study of the inflectional heads of the Balkan languaes. Doctoral dissertation. City University of New York.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1993. Agr-based case theory and its interaction with the A-bar system. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11:203–238.Google Scholar