No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On the putative rule of sentence-lifting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Extract
Sentences like the following are basically the same in meaning (although not absolutely the same).
(1) I believe Ralph came
(2) Ralph came, I believe
These have been described by Green and Morgan (1972) and Hooper and Thompson (1973) as related by a transformational rule of Sentence-Lifting or Complement Preposing (to be abbreviated here as “Slifting”). By this hypothesized rule, an underlying embedded sentence, here “Ralph came,” is raised so that it precedes its higher subject and verb. Bolinger (1968) describes sentences such as (1) and (2) as related by a rule of Main Phrase Postposing, by which the material at the beginning of the sentence is moved to the end. None of these writers give any arguments for setting up the rule as they do.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Fall 1976 , pp. 153 - 170
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1976