Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:50:58.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peripheral in Consonants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Keren Rice
Keren Rice*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent work in feature geometry, the internal structure of the Place node has been the subject of attention. In the earliest work, the place features [anterior], [coronal], [high], [low], [back], and [round] proposed by Chomsky and Halle (1968) were arrayed under the Place node (Clements 1985). In later work it was argued that such an arrangement did not capture the classes required for operations involving place of articulation, and it was proposed that unary articulator features Labial, Coronal, and Dorsal be used, with [anterior], [high], [low], [back], and [round] being dependents of these major articulators (Sagey 1986; McCarthy 1988). This structure, which I will call the “flat structure”, is diagrammed in (1).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 191 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, Peter and Rice, Keren 1989. Segment Structure and Coronal Underspecification. Phonology. 6: 179–200.Google Scholar
Breen, J.G 1981. Margany and Gunya. Pp. 275–393 in Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 2. Dixon, Robert M.W. and Blake, Barry J., eds. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle 1974. Phonological Features: Problems and Proposals. Language. 50:52–65.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu 1988. Korean Assimilation. Pp. 41–52 in Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Borer, Hagit, ed. Stanford: Stanford Linguistic Association and the Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu 1990. Parameters of Consonantal Assimilation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu 1991. On the Universality of the Coronal Articulator. Pp. 159–179 in The Special Status of Coronals. Internal and External Evidence. Phonetics and Phonology. 2. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Young-mee Yu, and Inkelas, Sharon 1993. Inalterability as Prespecification. Language. 69:529–574.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1976. Palatalization: Linking or Assimilation? Pp. 96–109 in Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting. Mufwene, Salikoko, Walker, Carol, and Steever, Sanford, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. The Geometry of Phonological Features. Phonology Yearbook. 2:223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1991. Place of Articulation in Consonants and Vowels: A Unified Theory. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory. 5:77–123.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Hume, Elizabeth 1994. The Internal Organization of Segments. In Handbook of Phonological Theory. Goldsmith, John, ed. Oxford: Blackwell. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel J. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collinder, Bjorn 1965. An Introduction to the Uralic Languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1980. The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques 1988. Les phénomènes de nasalité en français du Midi: Phonologie de dépendance et sous-spécification. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes: Nouvelles Phonologies. 17:29–54.Google Scholar
Dyck, Carrie 1994. Constraining the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Elbert, Samuel H., and Pukui, Mary K. 1979. Hawaiian Grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Ives 1974. An Outline of the Historical Phonology of Arapaho and Atsina. International Journal of American Linguistics. 40:102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1969. The Prehistory of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Philip 1993. Intrinsic Markedness Relations in Segment Structure. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 12(2):79–96.Google Scholar
Harrison, Sheldon P. 1976. Mokilese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Sheldon P., and Salich, Albert 1977. Mokilese-English Dictionary. PALI Language Texts: Micronesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth 1992. Front Vowels, Coronal Consonants, and Their Interaction In Nonlinear Phonology. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry 1973. The Feature [grave] in Phonological Theory. Journal of Phonetics. 1:329–337.Google Scholar
Iverson, Greg, and Kim, K.-H. 1987. Underspecification and Hierarchical Feature Representation in Korean Consonantal Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society. 23:182–198.Google Scholar
Iverson, Greg, and Lee, S.-S. 1994. Variation and Optimality in Korean Consonantal Phonology. In Proceedings of the 1994 Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ithaca: Cornell University Working Papers. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar, and Halle, Morris 1963. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [1952.]Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael, and Leer, Jeff 1981. Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit Sonorants. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers. 5. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger 1976. English Phonology and Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan 1987. A Reduction and Spreading Theory of Voicing and Other Sound Effects. Ms.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John 1988. Feature Geometry and Dependency. Phonetica. 43:84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandris, Octave 1963. Phonétique historique du roumain. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. 1991. The Special Status of Coronals. Internal and External Evidence. Phonetics and Phonology. 2. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François 1994. A Reanalysis of Velar Transparency Cases. The Linguistic Review. 11:101–140.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [To appear.]Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin 1989. The Role of Coronal in Articulator Based Features. Chicago Linguistic Society. 25:375–393.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren 1993. Default Variability: The Coronal-Velar Relationship. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 12(2):97–130.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren 1994. On the Organization and Specification of Vowel Place Features. Paper read at colloquia at Ohio State University and at MIT.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren, and Avery, Peter 1993. Segmental Complexity and the Structure of Inventories. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 12(2):131–153.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren, and Avery, Peter 1994. Variability in a Deterministic Model of Language Acquisition: A Theory of Segmental Elaboration. In Phonological Acquisition and Phonological Theory. Archibald, John, ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon 1993. Coronality and Vocalic Underspecification. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 12(2):155–177.Google Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth 1986. The Representation of Features and Relations in Nonlinear Phonology. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Sala, Marius 1976. Contributions à la phonétique historique du roumain. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Shaw, Patricia 1980. Theoretical Issues in Dakota Phonology and Morphology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca 1994. Underspecification and Markedness. In Handbook of Phonology. Goldsmith, John, ed. Oxford: Blackwell. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Thompson, Lawrence C. 1965. A Vietnamese Grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Trigo, R. Loren 1988. On the Phonological Derivation and Behavior of Nasal Glides. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel 1993. A Vowel Feature Hierarchy for Contrastive Specification. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics. 12(2):179–197.Google Scholar
Wu, Yuwen 1994. Mandarin Segmental Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira 1991. Coronals, Clusters, and the Coda Condition. Pp. 61–78 in The Special Status of Coronals. Internal and External Evidence. Phonetics and Phonology. 2. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar