Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:16:09.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The PERSON restriction on periphrastic irrealis complementizers and the interpretation of subject pro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2019

Hailey Hyekyeong Ceong
Hailey Hyekyeong Ceong*
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
*
hkc@uvic.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Squib/Notule
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 753 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback on earlier drafts and the guest editors for their copy-editing assistance. Thanks also to Peter Jacobs, Myung-Kwan Park, Leslie Saxon, and Martina Wiltschko for their constructive and helpful comments on my dissertation, on which this squib is partly based. Any remaining errors are my own. Unless otherwise indicated, examples reported in this squib are drawn from my own native speaker's knowledge of Korean.

References

Barbosa, Pilar. 2011. Pro-drop and theories of pro in the Minimalist Program (part 1): Consistent null subject languages and the pronominal-Agr hypothesis. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(8): 551–570.Google Scholar
Ceong, Hailey Hyekyeong. 2019. The morphosyntax of clause typing: Single, double, periphrastic, and multifunctional complementizers in Korean. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris and Postal, Paul. 2012. Imposters: A study of pronominal agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, and Lee, Chungmin. 2007. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 38(2): 373–395.Google Scholar
Han, Na-Rae. 2006. Korean zero pronouns: Analysis and resolution. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Nayudu, Aarti, and Sheehan, Michelle. 2009. Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63(1): 59–97.Google Scholar
Huang, C. T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 531–574.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Tamar, and Whitman, John. 1995. The category of relative clauses in Japanese, with reference to Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics: 4(1):29–58.Google Scholar
Koo, Myung-Chul, and Lehmann, Christian. 2010. Modality in the Korean suffix -keyss. Language Research 46(1): 83–102.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Pak, Miok, and Portner, Paul. 2012. A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(4): 1231–1274.Google Scholar