Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:11:04.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert R. Ratcliffe. The ‘Broken’ Plural Problem in Arabic and Comparative Semitic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1998. Pp. xi + 261. US$89.00 (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Alan S. Kaye*
Affiliation:
California State University/Fullerton

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hinds, Martin, and Badawi, El-Said. 1986. A dictionary of Egyptian Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1991. Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François, Beland, Renée, and Idrissi, Ali. To appear. The mental representation of Semitic words.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R. 1992. The broken plural problem in Arabic, Semitic and Afroasiatic: A solution based on the diachronic application of prosodie analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R. 1996. Drift and noun plural reduplication in Afroasiatic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 59:296311.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R. 1998. Defining morphological isoglosses: The ‘broken’ plural and Semitic subclassification. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 57:81123.Google Scholar
Wehr, Hans. 1974. A dictionary of modern written Arabic, ed. by Cowan, J Milton. Ithaca, NY: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar