No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Rule of Presupposition Carrying in Alternative Questions*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Extract
In alternative questions, the second clause is frequently incomplete. For example, sentence (2) is understood as synonymous with sentence (1):
(1) Did John read the book or did Mary read the book?
(2) Did John read the book or did Mary?
This paper addresses the problem of how the incomplete second conjuncts are to be assigned full semantic representations, and thus attempts to account for the synonymy of (1) and (2).
- Type
- Remarks/Remarques
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , Spring 1980 , pp. 53 - 58
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1980
Footnotes
This article is a slightly expanded version of a paper presented at the 1979 LSA Winter Meeting in Los Angeles. I would like to thank E. A. Cowper for much helpful discussion of the issues, and J. K. Chambers for his comments on an earlier draft. The research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.