Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:26:43.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sechelt statives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Ronald C. Beaumont
Ronald C. Beaumont*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The derivational system of Sechelt (Coast Salish) includes stative formations serving a variety of functions, one of which is the indication of possession in certain constructions. A sampling of stative forms is offered here, along with observations on their derivation. The purpose of this study is to propose, on the basis of such a survey, a generalized conceptual definition of the stative aspect in Sechelt and to suggest reasons for certain restrictions in the use of statives in possessive structures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Fall 1973 , pp. 102 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chafe, Wallace L. 1970 Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drachman, Gaberell 1969 Twana Phonology. Columbus, Ohio: Dept. of Linguistics [Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, No. 5].Google Scholar
Hill-Tout, Charles 1904 Report on the Ethnology of the Siciatl of British Columbia, a Coast Division of the Salish Stock. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 34. 20–91.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale and Sloat, Clarence 1972 Proto-Eastern Interior Salish Vowels. If AL 38. 26–48.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C and Thompson, M. Terry 1971 Clallam: a Preview. In Jesse Sawyer (ed.), Studies in American Indian Languages., pp. 251–94 [University of California Publications in Linguistics, 65].Google Scholar