Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:29:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Issues in CV Phonology With Reference to the History of Chinese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Edwin G. Pulleyblank
Edwin G. Pulleyblank*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My starting point is the theory of CV phonology as developed by Clements and Keyser (1981, 1983) which, in turn, is one of a number of theories of syllable structure that have been proposed during the past decade to replace the earlier linear concept of generative phonology. These theories have in common that the syllable is recognized as a hierarchical unit in phonological representation and not just a concatenation of segments. Kahn (1976), whose dissertation on English first persuaded generative linguists of the need to depart from the linear model, proposed a tier of syllable nodes (here symbolized as $) linked directly to the segments — consonants and vowels — of the traditional analysis, as in the representation of the word Jennifer in (1) (taken from Clements and Keyser 1983:3).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Fall 1986 , pp. 225 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1974 The Organization of Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan 1978 Syllabic consonants. Pp. 157–201 in Universals of Human Language v. 2. Phonology. Greenberg, J.H., ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard, and Trager, George L. 1942 Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni, Ito, Junko, and Mester, Ralf-Armin 1984 The Formal Representation of Ambisyllabicity: Evidence from Danish. Ms.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle 1974 Phonological Features: Problems and Proposals. Language 50: 52–65.Google Scholar
Chan, Marjorie Kit Man 1985 Fuzhou Phonology: A Non-Linear Analysis of Tone and Stress. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 1948 The Voiced Velar Fricative as an Initial in Mandarin. Le maître phonétique 89:2–3.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren 1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. 1976 From Middle Chinese to Modern Peking. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4:113–277.Google Scholar
Cheng, Chin-chuan 1973 A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel Jay 1981 A Three-Tiered Theory of the Syllable. Center for Cognitive Science. MIT Occasional Paper No. 19, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel Jay 1983 CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dell, François 1980 Generative Phonology and French Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, H.A. 1961 An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. Rev. ed. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris 1977 Tenseness, Vowel Shift and the Phonology of Back Vowels in English. Linguistic Inquiry 8:611–625.Google Scholar
Hartman, Lawton M. III 1944 The Segmental Phonemes of the Peiping Dialect. Language 20:28–42.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J.A. 1966 Towards a Prosodic Statement of the Vietnamese Syllable Structure. Pp. 163–197 in In memory of J.R. Firth. Bazell, C.J. et al, eds. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J.A. 1985 Greenberg’s “Universals” Again: A Note on the Case of Karen. Pp. 138–140 in Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan Area. Thurgood, G., ed. Canberra: Australian National Unversity, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jäschke, H.A. 1958 A Tibetan-English Dictionary. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Originally published 1881].Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D., and Lowenstamm, Jean 1981 De la syllabicité. Ms.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D., Lowenstamm, Jean, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1985 The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government. Ms.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 1982 A Course in Phonetics. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis 1961 Trois notes sur l’écriture ‘phags-pa. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 13 201–237.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1957 Problems of Hierarchy and Indeterminacy in Mandarin Phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 29: 219–29.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1979 Formal Patterns in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Patterson, George W. 1969 A Comparative Study of Aspects of the Vocalic Systems of Standard French and the French Dialect Spoken at Falher, Alberta. MA thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1981 The Phonology and Morphology of Axininca Campa. Arlington, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1981 Distinctive Features of Vowels and Pekingese Phonology in Historical Perspective. Pp. 75–93 in Proceedings of the International Conference on Sinology, Section on Linguistics and Palaeography. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1983 Middle Chinese Reflexes of Old Chinese Final Palatals, Labialvelars and Uvulars. Journal of African and Asian Studies 25:45–60.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1984a Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1984b Vowelless Chinese? An Application of the Three-Tiered Theory of Syllable Structure to Pekingese. Pp. 568–619 in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Lnaguages and Linguistics, vo. 2, Chan, Marjorie K.M., ed. Seattle: Department of Asian Languages and Literature, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A. 1962 Review of Yu. N. Rerikh, Tibetskii Yazyk. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 14:337–340.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, A. 1966 Tibeto-Mongolica. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy 1984 Segmental Rules of English and Cyclic Phonology. Language 60:21–54.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A. 1968 French Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard 1981 Concreteness in Generative Phonology: Evidence from French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walli, B. 1984 On the Representation of Complex Segments and their Formation in Kinyarwanda. To appear in Studies in Compensatory Lengthening. Sezer, Engin and Wetzels, W. Leo, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Wang, Fushi 1963 Beijinghua Yunmu de Jige Wenti. Zhongguo Yuwen 123:115–124.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira 1982 Reduplication and C-V Skeleta in Chinese Secret Languages. Linguistic Inquiry 13:637–661.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira 1983 Some Problems of Syllable Structure in Axininca Campa. In Proceedings of NELS 13, Sells, P. and Jones, C., eds. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Yue Hashimoto, Oi-kan 1972 Studies in Yue Dialects 1: Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar