Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:39:18.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syntax and Human Experience: la perspective de Nicolas Ruwet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Bert Peeters
Bert Peeters*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article-compte rendu
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 225 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Authier, J.-Marc, et Reed, Lisa 1991. Ergative Predicates and Dative Cliticization in French Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry. 22:197–205.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond J. Jr. 1990. Psycholinguistic Studies on the Conceptual Basis of Idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics. 1:417–451.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán 1986. Metaphors of Anger, Pride and Love. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine 1989. Unaccusativity in French. Lingua. 79:95–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoliu-Manea, Maria 1990. French Neuter Demonstratives: Evidence for a Pragma-Semantic Definition of Pronouns. Pp. 89–115 dans Variation and Change in French. Essays Presented to Rebecca Posner on the Occasion of her Sixtieth Birthday. Green, John N. et Ayres-Bennett, Wendy dir. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McClure, William 1990. A Lexical Semantic Explanation for Unaccusative Mismatches. Pp. 305–318 dans Grammatical Relations. A Cross-Theoretical Perspective. Dziwirek, Katarzyna, Farrell, Patrick, et Mejias-Bíkandi, Errapel dir. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Olié, Annie 1984. L’hypothèse de l’inaccusatif en français. Lingvisticae investigationes. 8:363–401.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1990. Compte rendu de Jan van Voorst, Event Structure . Revue canadienne de linguistique. 35:396–401.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1991. Compte rendu de Zoltán Kövecses, Metaphors of Anger, Pride and Love. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 11:229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas 1967. Introduction à la grammaire générative. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas 1972. Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas 1982. Grammaire des insultes et autres études. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Watbled, Jean-Philippe 1990. L’ergati vité: morphologie, syntaxe, et sémantique. Sigma. 14:21–73.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1987. La réflexivité ergative en français moderne. Le français moderne. 55: 23–54.Google Scholar