Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:25:48.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TO BE in the Progressive: A New Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Walter Hirtle  and
Claude Bégin
Walter Hirtle
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Claude Bégin
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Visser (1973:1968) gives a long list of verbs “more or less incompatible” with the progressive that have this in common: in their general sense

they do not express a real activity . . . In order to account for their use in the expanded form one ought to go in quest of the various senses and sub-senses that are tinged with a notion — however slight — of activity. (1973:1969)

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Gertrude 1927 The Letters of Gertrude Bell. Vol. 1. London: Benn. Google Scholar
Buyssens, Eric 1968 Les deux aspectifs de la conjugaison anglaise au XXe siècle. Bruxelles: Presses universitaires de Bruxelles. Google Scholar
Christie, Agatha 1967 Endless Night. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Christie, Agatha 1970 Evil Under the Sun. Toronto: Pocket Book. [First published 1941].Google Scholar
Diver, M. 1927 But Yesterday. London: Grosset and Dunlap. Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave 1984 Foundations for a Science of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Hirtle, Walter H. 1967 The Simple and Progressive Forms. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval. Google Scholar
Hirtle, Walter H. 1988 Events, Time and the Simple Form. Revue québécoise de linguistique 17:85–106.Google Scholar
Hirtle, Walter H., and Curat, V.N. 1986 The Simple and Progressive: ‘Future’ Use. Transactions of the Philological Society: 42–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Aldous 1936 Crome Yellow. London: Penguin. [1921].Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous 1965 Brief Candles. London: Penguin. [1930].Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1954 A Modern English Grammar, Part IV. London: Allen and Unwin. Google Scholar
Lawrence, D.H. 1960 The Ladybird. London: Penguin. [1923].Google Scholar
Lewis, Sinclair 1961 Arrowsmith. New York: Signet, New American Library. [1925].Google Scholar
Mossé, Ferdinand 1938 Histoire de ¡a forme périphrastique être + participe présent en Germanique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Osselton, N.E. 1979 Points of Modem English Syntax. English Studies 60.Google Scholar
Osselton, N.E. 1980 Points of Modern English Syntax. English Studies 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, H. 1926 A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part II, Section II. Groningen: Nordhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. 1973 On the State of Progress on Progressives and Statives. Pp. 83–95 in New Ways of Analyzing Variationin English. Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger W., eds. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
Scheffer, Johannes 1975 The Progressive in English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Visser, F.Th. 1973 An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part HI, Second half. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Google Scholar
Walpole, Hugh 1919 The Secret City. New York: Doran.Google Scholar
Wells, H.G. 1917 Mr. Britling Sees it Through. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wells, H.G. 1918 Joan and Peter. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wood, Frederick T. 1962 Correspondence. English Language Teaching 16.Google Scholar