Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:22:58.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Werner Marxgut. Der französische Sozialwortschatz im 17. Jahrhundert: ein Beitrag zur paradigmatischen Semantik. Pro Lingua 3. Wilhelmsfeld: Gottfried Egert Verlag. 1989. Pp. 404.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Bert Peeters*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Geckeler, Horst 1971 Zur Wortfelddiskussion. Untersuchungen zur Gliederung des Wortfeldes ‘alt-jung-neu’ im heutigen Französisch. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Göran 1981 On Broad and Narrow Linguistics. Pp. 5965 dans Logos semantikos: Studia linguistica in honorem E. Coseriu, Vol. 2. Weydt, Harald, réd. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil 1964 Minimal Systems, Potential Distinctions and Primitive Structures. Pp. 7883 dans Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. Lunt, Horace G., réd. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martinet, André 1989 Fonction et dynamique des langues. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1985 A propos des cases vides. Pp. 252254 dans Actes du XIe Colloque international de linguistique fonctionnelle. Ducos, Gisèle et Stati, Sorin, réds. Padova: CLESP.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1990 Compte rendu de Martinet, Fonction et dynamique des langues. Language 66:876.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1991a Synchronie, diachronie et synchronie dynamique dans les publications d’André Martinet. Langues et linguistique 17:169187.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert 1991b More About Axiological Fields. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 36:113136.Google Scholar