Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:22:13.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conjugates and Legendre Transforms of Convex Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

R. T. Rockafellar
R. T. Rockafellar*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fenchel's conjugate correspondence for convex functions may be viewed as a generalization of the classical Legendre correspondence, as indicated briefly in (6). Here the relationship between the two correspondences will be described in detail. Essentially, the conjugate reduces to the Legendre transform if and only if the subdifferential of the convex function is a one-to-one mapping. The one-to-oneness is equivalent to differentiability and strict convexity, plus a condition that the function become infinitely steep near boundary points of its effective domain. These conditions are shown to be the very ones under which the Legendre correspondence is well-defined and symmetric among convex functions. Facts about Legendre transforms may thus be deduced using the elegant, geometrically motivated methods of Fenchel. This has definite advantages over the more restrictive classical treatment of the Legendre transformation in terms of implicit functions, determinants, and the like.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 19 , 1967 , pp. 200 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1967

References

1. Bernstein, B. and Toupin, R. A., Some properties of the Hessian matrix of a strictly convex function, J. Reine Angew. Math., 210 (1962), 65–72.Google Scholar
2. Bonnesen, T. and Fenchel, W., Konvexe Körper (Berlin, 1934).Google Scholar
3. Courant, R. and Hilbert, D., Methods of mathematical physics, Vol. I (New York, 1953).Google Scholar
4. Courant, R. and Hilbert, D., Methods of mathematical physics, Vol. II (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
5. Dennis, J. B., Mathematical Programming and Electrical Networks (New York, 1959).Google Scholar
6. Fenchel, W., On conjugate convex functions, Can. J. Math. 1 (1949), 73–77.Google Scholar
7. Fenchel, W., Convex cones, sets and functions, lecture notes (Princeton, 1953).Google Scholar
8. Mackey, G. W., The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
9. Rockafellar, R. T., Level sets and continuity of conjugate convex functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1966), 46–63.Google Scholar
10. Rockafellar, R. T., Characterization of the subdifferentials of convex functions, Pacific J. Math. 17 (1966), 497–510.Google Scholar